Suchergebnisse

An outstanding feature of the far-reaching plans for development which China has been earnestly promoting under the general rubric of the 'four modernizations' is the post-Mao leadership's determined effort to revive and thoroughly institutionalize a meaningful and formal legal system. There is an obvious and sharp distinction between the policies towards law pursued during the period between the mid-1950s and the mid-1970s and the more recent attempts to fashion a pivotal role for law in Chinese society. Throughout much of the course of socialist rule China's leaders have been concerned not with promoting effective legal institutions but, rather, with the direct insertion of extrinsic political norms and values into the law. During the Cultural Revolution many important legal structures ceased to function. In contrast, in the years since 1978 an important aspect of the rigorous political reaction to the uncertainty and conflict of the Cultural Revolution has been unequivocal support for the establishment of a sound legal system. The leadership now believes that systematic and regulated law-making, public awareness of the law, and proper application of the rules should be integral elements in the administration of justice in the PRC. The hope is that this approach will prevent the recurrence of arbitrary political rule, curb reliance on 'connections' or guanxi in bureaucratic conduct, promote economic growth and generally encourage the development of a more predictable and orderly social life.

AbstractThis article introduces readers to a new perspective on meeting library user needs. The author employs Kano theory to examine library user demands in Chinese law libraries and how law libraries in China have tried to meet user needs on three different levels. The Kano model was first introduced by Professor Noriaki Kano of Tokyo Rika University. The model was based on the assumption that customer needs are constantly changing and the question becomes how to meet library users' evolving demands. The article summarizes demands of Chinese law library patrons on three levels: basic needs, performance, and excitement demands. Currently, most Chinese academic law libraries meet the basic needs of library users, but they need to further enhance user satisfaction and promote the law libraries' status as a legal information center instead of merely a place to collect and house books.

In modern maritime commerce, the bill of lading is usually regarded as a document of title. This is also the case under Chinese law. However, unlike other jurisdictions such as the UK and the US, the exact effects of the bill of lading as a document of title have never been clarified in China due to the silence of Chinese law in this regard. In consequence of that, various explanations on the notion "bill of lading as document of title" have been developed. Unfortunately, none of them is fully compatible with the existing Chinese law and the reality of trade. To understand the notion "bill of lading as document of title" precisely, this article revisits English law and American law from which Chinese law borrows the notion and uncovers that the definition of the notion in national law may be influenced by the following factors: the legislative intent of the national law on the usage of the bill of lading, the freedom of contract in transfer of property rights in goods, and the domestic law on doctrine of good faith purchase. This article then analyses these factors in the context of Chinese law and policy, seeking to find a proper way to clarify the notion "bill of lading as document of title" and localise such a notion to suit Chinese legal and economic background.