Feminism and Gender Studies in International Relations Theory
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies
"Feminism and Gender Studies in International Relations Theory" published on by Oxford University Press.
6176743 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies
"Feminism and Gender Studies in International Relations Theory" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: IDS bulletin, Band 35, Heft 4
ISSN: 0265-5012, 0308-5872
In: Canadian journal of development studies: Revue canadienne d'études du développement, Band 22, S. 805-1129
ISSN: 0225-5189
In: IDS bulletin, Band 35, Heft 4, S. 1-10
ISSN: 0265-5012, 0308-5872
Individualist feminism argues that the slogan "a woman's body, a woman's right" should extend to every peaceful choice a woman can make. For example, it demands that all sexual choices, from motherhood to participating in pornography, be legally respected. The cost of such freedom is personal responsibility and a refusal to appeal to government for privilege or protection. As a school within the broader feminist tradition, individual feminism contrasts sharply with gender feminism both in its theory and its history. Indeed, the two schools define the ideological extremes of the feminist movement. Their differing interpretations of such concepts as "equality," "class," and "justice" stand in opposition to each other and could restimulate what many consider to be a dying movement by breaking through the shell of dogma that surrounds it. And, yet, because gender feminism has dominated the movement for decades, the disagreements expressed by individualist feminism have been labeled as "anti-feminist" and even "anti-woman." It is time to reclaim this neglected and rich tradition, including the many heroic figures who struggled and suffered so that contemporary women can enjoy their many freedoms.
BASE
In: Development and change, Band 38, Heft 1, S. 131-147
ISSN: 1467-7660
ABSTRACTUnited Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on 'Women, peace and security', passed in 2000, reflects a recent growth in women's peace activism. Women's resistance to violence is widely believed to be a mobilizing factor in both local and international peace movements. This provokes questions around essentialism and violence of concern to feminists: are men inherently territorial and aggressive, and women naturally nurturing and peaceable? Or is the behaviour of both conditioned by particular local configurations of social relations of power? This contribution reviews these questions in the light of the experiences of women's peace organizations. It concludes that essentializing women's roles as wives, mothers and nurses discourages their inclusion as active decision makers in political arenas, as well as overshadowing the needs of other disadvantaged groups. Rather than seeing war as the violation of women by men, we should recognize that men and women are each differently violated by war.
The human society is made up of men and women created to live as partners but it is widely recognized that women are in subordinate position in societies. Gender discriminations against women and the struggle to achieve equality with men in social, economic and political advancement remains an undying issue in societies. The paper explores the roots of patriarchy, domains of women`s deprivations and their negotiations in societies. It concludes by foregrounding the position of women in the society and offers ways to assist their equal and balance development with men. DOI:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n26p28
BASE
In: International feminist journal of politics, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 213-233
ISSN: 1461-6742
In: Electoral Studies, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 203-216
In: Gender Myths and Feminist Fables, S. 127-143
In: Gender and culture
In: Canadian journal of development studies 22.2001,Special issue
In: IDS bulletin: transforming development knowledge, Band 39, Heft 6, S. 1-9
ISSN: 1759-5436
In: IDS bulletin: transforming development knowledge, Band 35, Heft 4, S. 1-10
ISSN: 1759-5436
Recently, labor has acquired a re-emergent public relevance. In response, feminist theory urgently needs to reconsider the relationship between labor and gender. This book builds a theoretically-informed politics about changes in the gendered structure of labor by analyzing how the symbolic power of gender is put in the service of neoliberal practices. Goodman traces the cultural contextualization of 'women's work' from its Marxist roots to its current practices. From the income gap to the gendering of industries, Goodman explores and critiques the rise of corporate power under neoliberalism and the ways and whys that femininity has become one of its principle commodities.