Suchergebnisse

This study examines the relationships of exposure and attention to various news media, including the Internet, with information learned about the issue positions of candidates George Bush and Al Gore, interest in the 2000 election campaign, and intention to vote among a random sample of adult residents of Indiana who were interviewed by telephone in October and November 2000. The findings are compared with those of previous studies of the 1988, 1992, and 1996 presidential elections. They confirm the importance of television news and television debates as sources of issue information, despite criticisms, and the importance of paying attention to newspaper campaign news for voting.

This study examines the relationships of exposure and attention to various news media with information learned about the issue positions of 1996 U.S. presidential candidates Bill Clinton, Bob Dole, and Ross Perot; level of interest in this election campaign; and intention to vote among 534 adult residents of Indiana during late October and early November of 1996. Contrary to previous studies of voter learning in U.S. presidential elections, this survey finds statistically significant associations only between the media measures and campaign interest, but not between media exposure/attention and knowledge of candidate issue positions or likelihood of voting, after controlling statistically for various demographics and level of interest in the campaign. Possible reasons for these markedly different findings for 1996 are discussed.

Over the past few years, political candidates and their parties have jumped on the bandwagon of cyberpolitics by creating Web sites to disseminate information and to take the pulse of the voters. The number of on-line polls has also increased dramatically. In surveying such polls on the Web, this article examines how they are conducted and how they are reported by the traditional news media.

Examines the effectiveness and reliability of Internet polling; how polls are conducted and reported by the media, and their impact on public opinion; based on analysis of polls on 57 web sites; 1992-96; US. Some focus on political polls.

Compares randomly selected presidential biographies to 1992 presidential election coverage; US.

What are the appropriate criteria for evaluating candidates for the presidency? To find answers based on the collective record of the past, we analyzed the content of randomly selected biographies covering a dozen modern presidencies. From these, we distilled lists of performance criteria to which over one hundred biographers attributed the successes and failures of presidencies. Yet a comparison of eight newspapers and three news magazines revealed that these significant criteria were deemphasized in the print media during the 1992 presidential campaign. Considering the potential significance of performance-related information, we conclude that the news media should provide voters with more coverage that directly speaks to the candidates' talents for managing the presidency.

This study is based on telephone interviews with a random sample of 504 adult Indiana residents from 21 October to 2 November 1992. Through hierarchical multiple regression analyses it seeks to test whether more exposure and attention to "nontraditional" news media (such as television "talk shows" and the morning TV network shows) predicted more knowledge of the issue positions of the candidates, a greater likelihood of voting, or more interest in the campaign. Statistical controls for demographics, traditional news media exposure and attention, and presidential debate exposure are introduced. This study also examines whether more exposure and attention to the traditional news media of radio, television, and newspapers, as well as exposure to the televised presidential debates, is associated with more campaign interest and knowledge after controlling for various demographics.