Suchergebnisse
Filter
110 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Grotius and International Equality
In: Hugo Grotius and International Relations, S. 221-240
Bringing Order to the Causes of War Debates
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 19-36
ISSN: 1477-9021
Bringing order to the causes of war debates
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 19-35
ISSN: 0305-8298
World Affairs Online
The domestic analogy and world order proposals
In: Cambridge studies in international relations 6
Book Review: Martin Ceadel, Thinking about Peace and War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987, 222pp., £14.95)
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Band 17, Heft 3, S. 561-562
ISSN: 1477-9021
Halliday's Two Concepts of State
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 71-76
ISSN: 1477-9021
Reflections on the domestic analogy: the case of Bull, Beitz and Linklater
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 145-158
ISSN: 1469-9044
According to the late Professor Hedley Bull, the 'domestic analogy' is:the argument from the experience of individual men in domestic society to the experience of states, according to which the need of individual men to stand in awe of a common power in order to live in peace is a ground for holding that states must do the same. The conditions of an orderly social life, on this view, are the same among states as they are within them: they require that the institutions of domestic society be reproduced on a universal scale.
Reflections on the Domestic Analogy: The Case of Bull, Beitz, and Linklater
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 145
ISSN: 0260-2105
Book Review: Terry Nardin, Law, Morality and the Relations of States (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983, 350pp., £30.40 hbk.. £ 12.60 pbk.)
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Band 14, Heft 1, S. 116-118
ISSN: 1477-9021
A. V. Lowe on general rules of international law
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 175-182
ISSN: 1469-9044
In his recent Review article, 'Do general rules of international law exist?', Lowe states that there are at least two interpretations of the nature of customary international law.1 In the following, I shall attempt to clarify what these two interpretations are, examine the implications which Lowe attaches to the interpretation which he favours, and discuss his assertions about truly general rules of international law.
The Structure of Institutionalism: an Anatomy of British Mainstream International Relations
In: International relations: the journal of the David Davies Memorial Institute of International Studies, Band 7, Heft 5, S. 2363-2381
ISSN: 1741-2862
A normative enquiry in international relations: the case of "pacta sunt servanda"
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 35-54
ISSN: 0260-2105
World Affairs Online
A normative enquiry in international relations: the case of 'pacta sunt servanda'
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 35-54
ISSN: 1469-9044
A study of ethics must be regarded as incomplete if it does not offer tools for analysing moral problems arising in the international context, particularly in an age of growing interdependence between the peoples of the world. Similarly, a study of international relations must be thought to be imperfect if it leaves out normative questions.To this it may be objected that International Relations is an empirical discipline, and that it can legitimately leave normative considerations to moral philosophers. However, such a division of labour is unfortunately more likely to result in mere division rather than efficient co-operation. Moreover, international relations, the subject-matter, is logically, as well as historically, prior to International Relations, the academic discipline. Therefore, a study of international relations, undertaken by International Relations experts, cannot be claimed to be complete if it neglects those aspects of the subject-matter which have occupied the minds of many thinkers who do not consider themselves as IR specialists.
Federalism and Federation, Models of Autonomy and Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy: Autonomy vs. Control
In: International affairs, Band 59, Heft 2, S. 267-268
ISSN: 1468-2346