Beyond the Cultural Argument
In: The Ethics of Nationalism, S. 52-73
124 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The Ethics of Nationalism, S. 52-73
In: Nations and nationalism: journal of the Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 1-20
ISSN: 1469-8129
The essay examines a prominent normative defence of nationalism, which links shared nationality with the attainment of the goods of liberal justice and democratic governance. The essay first considers the argument that liberal values, and especially the value of social justice, will best be promoted in states whose members share a common nationality. In its strong form, this argument is vulnerable to counter‐instances. A weaker version, which claims that in states divided in terms of national identities, social justice may be precarious over the long term, is more plausible. The second part of the essay argues that there is a close relationship between democracy and shared national identity. This section spells out precisely how a common national identity is helpful both for representative institutions to function properly and for widespread participation on the part of ordinary citizens.
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique : RCSP, Band 34, Heft 1, S. 192-193
ISSN: 0008-4239
In: Nations and nationalism: journal of the Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 1-20
ISSN: 1354-5078
In: Political studies, Band 48, Heft 3, S. 586
ISSN: 0032-3217
In: Critical review of international social and political philosophy: CRISPP, Band 2, Heft 3, S. 26-47
ISSN: 1743-8772
In: Women & politics: a quarterly journal of research and policy studies, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 1-16
ISSN: 1540-9473
In: Critical review of international social and political philosophy: CRISPP, Band 2, Heft 3, S. 26-47
ISSN: 1369-8230
In: Women & politics, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 1-16
ISSN: 0195-7732
Argues that the relationship between liberal justice & care has been conceived incorrectly. Liberal justice theorists tend to relegate care to the personal sphere & thereby conceptualize it as a form of self-interested action. Care theorists, eg, Carol Gilligan (1982), have recognized that the language of care tends to be ignored by justice theorists, but they have tended to incorrectly identify justice & care as two genderized moralities. It is argued here that, in fact, justice theories, such as John Rawls's argument in A Theory of Justice (1971), presuppose care. It is concluded that liberal justice theory should incorporate its own dependence on the ethics of care & work toward a conception of justice & care as reciprocal & interdependent. 27 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: The review of politics, Band 60, Heft 3, S. 575-577
ISSN: 1748-6858
In: The review of politics, Band 60, Heft 3, S. 575-576
ISSN: 0034-6705
In: National Self-Determination and Secession, S. 1-12
In: National Self-Determination and Secession, S. 134-154
In: Political studies: the journal of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, Band 45, Heft 5, S. 900-913
ISSN: 1467-9248
This paper argues in favour of a conception of self-determination which involves the equal recognition of different national identities. It proceeds by, first, criticizing the dominant territorial (in contrast to national) conception of self-determination. It then addresses three main criticisms of a principle of national self-determination. These are (1) the argument from indeterminacy; (2) the argument from instability; (3) the problem of overlapping nationalities.
In: Political studies, Band 45, Heft 5, S. 900-913
ISSN: 0032-3217