From Peasant to Industrial Worker: On Collective Life History of Working Migrants from Turkey
In: International migration review: IMR, Band 20, Heft 3, S. 685-686
ISSN: 0197-9183
146 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International migration review: IMR, Band 20, Heft 3, S. 685-686
ISSN: 0197-9183
In: Contemporary economic policy: a journal of Western Economic Association International, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 72-86
ISSN: 1465-7287
This paper examines three farm labor issues: (1) how mechanization affects the demand for farm labor; (2) how immigration reform affects the supply of farm workers; and (3) how 10 years of collective bargaining affect the farm labor market. The evidence suggests that mechanization, immigration reform, and collective bargaining have had or will have fewer effects on the farm labor market than is often assumed. However, the farm labor market is vulnerable to future shocks if it remains isolated from nonfarm labor markets.
In: International migration review: IMR, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 774-775
ISSN: 1747-7379, 0197-9183
In: International migration review: IMR, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 135-143
ISSN: 1747-7379, 0197-9183
In: Migration today, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 21-28
ISSN: 0197-9175
In: International migration review: IMR, Band 19, S. 135-143
ISSN: 0197-9183
In: International migration review: IMR, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 774-775
ISSN: 0197-9183
In: Challenge: the magazine of economic affairs, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 34-42
ISSN: 1558-1489
In: International migration review: IMR, Band 14, Heft 4, S. 581-582
ISSN: 1747-7379, 0197-9183
In: International migration review: IMR, Band 14, Heft 4, S. 581-582
ISSN: 0197-9183
Article V of the United States Constitution sets out the amend- ment procedure, which consists of two stages, proposal and ratification. Each stage, in turn, offers two alternative procedures which can be interchanged to provide four means of effecting constitutional alteration. An amendment may be proposed either by a two-thirds vote of each house of Congress or by a national convention assembled upon proper application by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states; and an amendment may be ratified, as Congress decides, either by three-fourths of the state legislatures or by conventions in three-fourths of the states. To date, the legislative mode of ratification has been selected for all but one of the 32 resolutions submitted to the states, but despite the frequency of its use as contrasted to the convention method, very little is known about its origin and evolution. In particular, there are a number of constitutional, as well as practical questions which require definitive answers. For example, the resolution guaranteeing equal rights to women (ERA) is currently before the states where it has been approved by either 31 or 33 legislatures, depending upon whether ratification can be validly rescinded. To date, Nebraska and Tennessee have revoked their ratification and several other states are contem- plating similar action.
BASE
In: Public personnel management, Band 3, Heft 3, S. 180-184
ISSN: 1945-7421
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 33, Heft 5, S. 443
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 33, S. 443-447
ISSN: 0033-3352
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 85, Heft 4, S. 616-628
ISSN: 1538-165X