Suchergebnisse

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to examine whether physical activity, diet, and smoking behaviours are associated with health resource utilization and costs in the Canadian context. A secondary objective was to evaluate demographic and health behavioural characteristics of the participants of the study to assess the degree of respondent bias. METHODS: Self-reported physical activity, diet and smoking status were obtained from a large population-based sample of adults with diabetes (N=2311). Resource utilization and cost information was obtained by linking these data to the provincial government's administrative database. Multiple regression models examined predictors of resource utilization and costs for individuals with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 (T2D) diabetes separately. To assess the degree of responder bias, characteristics of individuals who consented to link data were compared with those who did not consent. RESULTS: Various measures of health care utilization and costs were negatively associated with physical activity behaviour in both T1D and T2D groups. Ever having smoked cigarettes was associated with higher resource utilization in individuals with T2D when controlling for demographic and health variables. Significant differences in demographic and health behavioural characteristics of the participants who provided consent for data linkage and those who did not were also found. CONCLUSION: These findings are of interest considering that PA is a critical but understudied component of individuals with diabetes, and this appears to be one of the first studies to directly examine the relationship between health-related behaviours and health care utilization and costs. The findings may be useful in guiding targeted health promotion programs for individuals with diabetes. The results also indicate that studies involving linkage of administrative and survey data could be over-represented by healthy individuals.

AbstractWe conducted a retrospective study between 1997 and 2000 with 200 participants in the Children in the Community Study at their mean age of 29 (range: 27–31 years). Participants completed detailed narrative interviews about their transition to adulthood and described monthly levels of partner conflict that had occurred between ages 17 and 27. Data from these interviews were used to investigate the developmental trajectory and predictors of conflict in romantic relationships. Multilevel growth models showed that partner conflict increased between ages 19 and 25 and then declined slightly. Parental divorce, low parental socioeconomic status, being an only child, being divorced, being married, cohabiting, and having biological offspring were associated with elevated partner conflict. Different patterns of association between these variables and partner conflict were observed in men and women.

Historicizing Fear is a historical interrogation of the use of fear as a tool to vilify and persecute groups and individuals from a global perspective, offering an unflinching look at racism, fearful framing, oppression, and marginalization across human history.The book examines fear and Othering from a historical context, providing a better understanding of how power and oppression is used in the present day. Contributors ground their work in the theory of Othering—the reductive action of labeling a person as someone who belongs to a subordinate social category defined as the Other—in relation to historical events, demonstrating that fear of the Other is universal, timeless, and interconnected. Chapters address the music of neo-Nazi white power groups, fear perpetuated through the social construct of black masculinity in a racially hegemonic society, the terror and racial cleansing in early twentieth-century Arkansas, the fear of drug-addicted Vietnam War veterans, the creation of fear by the Tang Dynasty, and more. Timely, provocative, and rigorously researched, Historicizing Fear shows how the Othering of members of different ethnic groups has been used to propagate fear and social tension, justify state violence, and prevent groups or individuals from gaining equality. Broadening the context of how fear of the Other can be used as a propaganda tool, this book will be of interest to scholars and students of history, anthropology, political science, popular culture, critical race issues, social justice, and ethnic studies, as well as the general reader concerned with the fearful framing prevalent in politics. Contributors: Quaylan Allen, Melanie Armstrong, Brecht De Smet, Kirsten Dyck, Adam C. Fong, Jeff Johnson, Łukasz Kamieński, Guy Lancaster, Henry Santos Metcalf, Julie M. Powell, Jelle Versieren

Providing a much needed overview of the growing field of digital sociology, this handbook connects digital media technologies to the traditional sociological areas of study, like labour, culture, education, race, class and gender. Rooted in a critical understanding of inequality as foundational to digital sociology and is edited by leaders in the field. It includes topics ranging from web analytics, wearable technologies, social media analysis and digital labour. This rigorous, accessible text explores contemporary dilemmas and problems of the digital age in relation to inequality, institutions and social identity, making it suitable for use for a global audience on a variety of social science courses and beyond. Offering an important step forward for the discipline of sociology Digital sociologies is an important intellectual benchmark in placing digital at the forefront of investigating the social