An overview of the municipal solid waste management modes and innovations in Shanghai, China
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 27, Heft 24, S. 29943-29953
ISSN: 1614-7499
74 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 27, Heft 24, S. 29943-29953
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 26, Heft 4, S. 3666-3674
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Journal of Industrial Ecology, Band 21, Heft 3, S. 651-661
SSRN
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 29, Heft 60, S. 90671-90685
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Climate policy, Band 21, Heft 7, S. 884-896
ISSN: 1752-7457
In: Waste management: international journal of integrated waste management, science and technology, Band 125, S. 249-256
ISSN: 1879-2456
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 27, Heft 25, S. 31092-31104
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 26, Heft 14, S. 14598-14615
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Journal of Industrial Ecology, Band 22, Heft 6, S. 1402-1412
SSRN
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 22, Heft 23, S. 18687-18698
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: McDowall , W , Geng , Y-J , Huang , B , Bartekova , E , Bleischwitz , R , Turkeli , S , Kemp , R & Domenech , T 2017 , ' Circular Economy Policies in China and Europe ' , Journal of Industrial Ecology , vol. 21 , no. 3 , pp. 651-661 . https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12597
The idea of a circular economy (ce) has become prominent in both european and chinese policy making. Chinese and european perspectives on a ce share a common conceptual basis and exhibit many similar concerns in seeking to enhance resource efficiency. Yet they also differ, and this article explores differences in the focus of ce policy in china and europe. We present evidence on the differing understandings of the ce concept in chinese and european policy discourse, drawing on qualitative and quantitative analysis of policy documents, media articles, and academic publications. We show that the chinese perspective on the ce is broad, incorporating pollution and other issues alongside waste and resource concerns, and it is framed as a response to the environmental challenges created by rapid growth and industrialization. In contrast, europe's conception of the ce has a narrower environmental scope, focusing more narrowly on waste and resources and opportunities for business. We then examine similarities and differences in the focus of policy activity in the two regions and in the indicators used to measure progress. We show differences in the treatment of issues of scale and place and different priorities across value chains (from design to manufacture, consumption, and waste management). We suggest some reasons for the divergent policy articulation of the ce concept and suggest lessons that each region can learn from the other.
BASE
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 38, S. 138-146
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: ISCIENCE-D-22-01971
SSRN
In: HELIYON-D-22-20381
SSRN