Suchergebnisse

The purpose of the research was to consider appropriate forms of interpretation of legal norms in modern jurisprudence. In the main content it has been established that the interpretation results in a general conclusion or a sum of conclusions reached by the subject of interpretation in the process of clarification of the rule of law (legal norms), using the whole set of methods of interpretation, which is appropriate to the legal reality. The methodological basis of the research was presented as comparative-legal and systematic analysis, formal-legal method, as well as hermeneutic method, method of analysis and synthesis. It has been concluded that the procedure for achieving the purpose of interpretation should be as follows: grammatical interpretation - teleological interpretation - clarification of the conformity of the essence of the content of the legal norm with the principles of law - systematic interpretation - special legal interpretation - logical interpretation - functional interpretation - historical interpretation - repeated application of the interpretation procedure upon receipt of new data. If this procedure is properly followed, it is possible to achieve the conditions for the achievement of an adequate legal hermeneutics, which places the texts in their context of meaning.

In this article an author studies the problems of definition in laws and regulations.

Drawing upon the French tradition of regulation theory – most notably associated with Aglietta – the author describes the 'forms of regulation' that have characterized the various stages of capitalism. He argues that while the current crisis consists of a disruption of the whole structure of monopoly regulation, it is not a deathknell for capitalism itself. A way out of the crisis would involve the development of a new form of regulation, a new regime of accumulation as a given historical and central institution of capitalism.