Deriving Risk Adjustment Payment Weights to Maximize Efficiency of Health Insurance Markets
In: NBER Working Paper No. w22642
2457 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: NBER Working Paper No. w22642
SSRN
This article addresses the issue referred to the remedies of the insurance contract for the non-payment of the premium. t hrough an analysis of the previous and current legislation, the author examines the consequences of the non-payment of the insurance premium in the contractual relationship. By recognizing the protective nature of the legislation in favor of the insured as the weak party, three specific contractual remedies are identified: The suspension of coverage, the termination of the contract and the the extinction of the contractual relationship by inaction of the parties. ; El presente artículo aborda la temática referida a los remedios del contrato de seguro ante el incumplimiento del pago de la prima. r ealizando un análisis de los remedios que planteaba la anterior legislación así como la vigente, el autor examina las consecuencias que tiene el incumplimiento del pago de la prima en la relación contractual. Reconociendo el carácter tuitivo de la legislación en favor del asegurado como parte débil, se identifica tres remedios contractuales específicos: la suspensión de la cobertura, la resolución del contrato y la extinción del contrato por inacción de las partes.
BASE
In: The Geneva papers on risk and insurance - issues and practice, Band 40, Heft 2, S. 334-352
ISSN: 1468-0440
In: IMF Working Papers v.Working Paper No. 14/123
This paper examines oversight issues that underlie the potential growth and risks in mobile payments. International experience suggests that financial authorities can develop effective oversight frameworks for new payment methods to safeguard public confidence and financial stability by establishing: (i) a clear legal regime; (ii) proportionate AML/CFT measures to prevent financial integrity risks; (iii) fund safeguarding measures such as insurance, similar guarantee schemes, or "pass through" deposit insurance; (iv) contingency plans for operational disruptions; and (v) risk controls and acce
BACKGROUND: Effective payment mechanisms for healthcare are critical to the quality of care and the efficiency and responsiveness of health systems to meet specific population health needs. Since its inception, Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) has adopted fee-for-service, diagnostic-related groups and capitation methods, which have contributed to provider reimbursement delays, rising costs and poor quality of care rendered to the scheme's clients. The aim of this study was to explore stakeholder perceptions of the feasibility of value-based payment (VBP) for healthcare in Ghana. Value-based payment refers to a system whereby healthcare providers are paid for the value of services rendered to patients instead of the volume of services. METHODS: This study employed a cross-sectional qualitative design. National-level stakeholders were purposively selected for in-depth interviews. The participants included policy-makers (n = 4), implementers (n = 5), public health insurers (n = 3), public and private healthcare providers (n = 7) and civil society organization officers (n = 1). Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Data analysis was performed using both deductive and inductive thematic analysis. The data were analysed using QSR NVivo 12 software. RESULTS: Generally, participants perceived VBP to be feasible if certain supporting systems were in place and potential implementation constraints were addressed. Although the concept of VBP was widely accepted, study participants reported that efficient resource management, provider motivation incentives and community empowerment were required to align VBP to the Ghanaian context. Weak electronic information systems and underdeveloped healthcare infrastructure were seen as challenges to the integration of VBP into the Ghanaian health system. Therefore, improvement of existing systems beyond healthcare, including public education, politics, data, finance, regulation, planning, infrastructure and stakeholder attitudes towards VBP, will affect the ...
BASE
In: IZA Discussion Paper No. 15834
SSRN
In: Health services insights, Band 14
ISSN: 1178-6329
This study estimates the amount antiretroviral therapy (ART) clients paid out of pocket for preventive and treatment services and the percentage of ART clients incurring catastrophic payments during the period when ART services were transitioning from donor funding to domestic social health insurance (SHI) in Vietnam. Using a cross-sectional facility-based survey in 9 provinces, a sample of 582 clients across 18 ART facilities representatives of all facilities where SHI-financed ART was being implemented were interviewed in 2019. Results indicated 13.4% (95% CI: 5.7%, 28.2%) of clients incurred a payment for outpatient ART care. The average out of pocket expenditures for outpatient visits and HIV related outpatient visits was USD $71.2 and $8 per year, respectively. The average out of pocket expenditure for inpatient admission and HIV related inpatient admission was $7.1 and $1.6, respectively. Only 0.1% clients currently experienced HIV-related catastrophic payment at the 25% of total expenditures threshold. The study confirms the transition from donor-financed ART to SHI-financed ART is not causing financial hardship for ART clients. However, more commitment from the Government of Vietnam to strengthen HIV-related services under SHI may be needed in the future, and there is still need to ensure universal SHI coverage among people with HIV/AIDs in Vietnam.
This study estimates the amount antiretroviral therapy (ART) clients paid out of pocket for preventive and treatment services and the percentage of ART clients incurring catastrophic payments during the period when ART services were transitioning from donor funding to domestic social health insurance (SHI) in Vietnam. Using a cross-sectional facility-based survey in 9 provinces, a sample of 582 clients across 18 ART facilities representatives of all facilities where SHI-financed ART was being implemented were interviewed in 2019. Results indicated 13.4% (95% CI: 5.7%, 28.2%) of clients incurred a payment for outpatient ART care. The average out of pocket expenditures for outpatient visits and HIV related outpatient visits was USD $71.2 and $8 per year, respectively. The average out of pocket expenditure for inpatient admission and HIV related inpatient admission was $7.1 and $1.6, respectively. Only 0.1% clients currently experienced HIV-related catastrophic payment at the 25% of total expenditures threshold. The study confirms the transition from donor-financed ART to SHI-financed ART is not causing financial hardship for ART clients. However, more commitment from the Government of Vietnam to strengthen HIV-related services under SHI may be needed in the future, and there is still need to ensure universal SHI coverage among people with HIV/AIDs in Vietnam.
BASE
In: Revista Română de Dreptul Muncii, No. 2, 2009
SSRN
In: HELIYON-D-23-15377
SSRN
In: Blätter der DGVFM, Band 29, Heft 2, S. 211-244
ISSN: 1864-0303
In: Mississippi State University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Working Paper Number 17 – 1 | March 2017
SSRN
Working paper
In: The Geneva papers on risk and insurance - issues and practice, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 111-116
ISSN: 1468-0440
A letter report issued by the General Accounting Office with an abstract that begins "Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on crop insurance, focusing on: (1) the extent to which crop insurance claims are paid in error--either unintentionally or fraudulently--and, to the extent practical, a comparison of the rate at which claims are paid in error with rates for other types of insurance; (2) the insurance companies' and the Department of Agriculture's Risk Management Agency's (RMA) quality controls to ensure that accurate claims payments are made; and (3) the proposals being considered to reduce insurance companies' administrative requirements and the potential impact of these proposals on the operations of the crop insurance program."
BASE
In: Medical care research and review, Band 70, Heft 5, S. 514-530
ISSN: 1552-6801
Research suggests that more than half of all emergency department (ED) visits in the United States are for nonurgent conditions, leading to billions of dollars in potentially avoidable spending annually. In this study, we examine the effects of co-payment changes on ED utilization among children enrolled in ALL Kids, Alabama's Children's Health Insurance Program We separately model the effect of the 2003 co-payment increases on the monthly probability of any ED visit, and visits within three severity categories, using linear probability models that control for beneficiary characteristics and time trends that are allowed to vary in the pre- and postperiods. We observe a small decline in the probability of ED visits 1 year after the co-payment increase. However, low-severity visits, which we hypothesize to be more price sensitive, show no significant evidence of a decline. Our study suggests that the modest co-payment changes were not effective in improving the efficiency of ED utilization.