Regulatory reform, 1975 : hearings before the Committee on Government Operations, United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, first session, pursuant to S. Res. 71
Hearings held Oct. 29-Dec. 19, 1975. ; Mode of access: Internet.
595101 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Hearings held Oct. 29-Dec. 19, 1975. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015077948167
Reuse of record except for individual research requires license from Congressional Information Service, Inc. ; Hearings held May 18-25, 1976, on S. 2258, S. 2716, S. 2812, S. 2878, S. 2903, S. 2925, S. 3318, and S. 3428. ; CIS Microfiche Accession Numbers: CIS 76 S401-36 ; Includes bibliographical references. ; Microfiche. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
SSRN
Working paper
In: OECD reviews of regulatory reform
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078617779
Reuse of record except for individual research requires license from Congressional Information Service, Inc. ; Hearings held Oct. 29-Dec. 19, 1975. ; CIS Microfiche Accession Numbers: CIS 76 S401-15 ; Microfiche. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
Other written product issued by the General Accounting Office with an abstract that begins "Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) new rule on fee recovery for fiscal year (FY) 1999. GAO noted that: (1) the final rule implements for FY 1999 section 6101 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990; (2) it requires NRC to recover from its applicants and licensees approximately 100 percent of its budget authority, less amounts appropriated from the Nuclear Waste Fund; (3) for FY 1999, NRC must collect approximately $449.6 million through these fees; (4) two types of fees are assessed: (a) applicants and licensees are charged for specific services, such as inspections and licensing reviews, that are provided by NRC; and (b) NRC assesses an annual fee to its licensees to recover generic costs that cannot be attributed to specific licensees; and (5) NRC complied with applicable requirements in promulgating the rule."
BASE
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 102, Heft 3, S. 638-640
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American Journal of International Law, Band 102, Heft 3, S. 638
In: American journal of international law, Band 102, Heft 3, S. 638-639
ISSN: 0002-9300
In: Catholic University Law Review, Forthcoming
SSRN
Working paper
Digital health in the United States is rapidly and continuously evolving to enhance patient care and revolutionize health care delivery. This technology offers substantial promise to both patients and providers, but lacks a comprehensive regulatory structure to ensure adequate safety and privacy. While the Department of Health and Human Services, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Federal Trade Commission regulate portions of the digital health industry, their oversight is incomplete, with numerous digital health companies falling between the cracks and assuming an unregulated status. This article analyzes the state of digital health legal and regulatory oversight in the United States, discusses how state legislatures and industry organizations have worked to fill existing legal gaps, and presents strategies for encouraging compliance for unregulated entities.
BASE
In: Yale Journal on Regulation, Band 38
SSRN
Working paper
Uncertainty in election outcomes generates politically induced regulatory risk. For monopoly regulation, political parties\' risk attitudes towards such risk depend on a fluctuation effect that hurts both parties and an output--expansion effect that benefits at least one party. Irrespective of the parties\' risk attitudes, political parties have incentives to negotiate away regulatory risk by pre-electoral bargaining. Pareto-efficient bargaining outcomes fully eliminate regulatory risk and are attainable through institutionalizing independent regulatory agencies with a specific objective. Key aspects of the regulatory overhaul of the US Postal system in 1970 are argued to be consistent with these results.
BASE
Other written product issued by the General Accounting Office with an abstract that begins "Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) new rule on fee recovery. GAO noted that: (1) the final rule would implement for fiscal year (FY) 2000 section 6101 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990; (2) it requires NRC to recover from its applicants and licensees approximately 100 percent of its budget authority, less amounts appropriated from the Nuclear Waste Fund; (3) for FY 2000, NRC must collect approximately $447 million through these fees; (4) two types of fees are assessed: (a) applicants and licensees are charged for specific services, such as inspections and licensing reviews, that are provided by the NRC; and (b) NRC assesses an annual fee to its licensees to recover generic costs that cannot be attributed to specific licensees; and (5) NRC complied with applicable requirements in promulgating the rule."
BASE
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/msu.31293201415167
"A-95." ; "February 1984." ; "A commission report." ; Includes bibliographical references. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE