About the Contributors
In: Signs: journal of women in culture and society, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 1731-1735
ISSN: 1545-6943
591 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Signs: journal of women in culture and society, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 1731-1735
ISSN: 1545-6943
In: The public opinion quarterly: POQ, Band 74, Heft 4, S. 711-781
ISSN: 1537-5331
In: Public opinion quarterly: journal of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Band 74, Heft 4, S. 711-711
ISSN: 0033-362X
In: Health security, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 35-45
ISSN: 2326-5108
'Hilliard' (Reg. no. CV-1163, PI 676271), a soft red winter (SRW) wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) developed and tested as VA11W-108 by the Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station, was released in March 2015. Hilliard was derived from the cross '25R47'/'Jamestown'. Hilliard is widely adapted, from Texas to Ontario, Canada, and provides producers with a mid-season, medium height, awned, semi-dwarf (Rht2) cul tivar that has very high yield potential, good straw strength, and intermediate grain volume weight and quality. It expresses moderate to high levels of resistance to most diseases prevalent in the eastern United States and Ontario. In the 2016-2018 USDA-ARS Uniform SRW Wheat nurseries, Hilliard ranked first in grain yield in the southern nursery across all 3 yr (5,147-5,758 kg ha(-1)). In the uniform eastern nursery, it ranked first for grain yield in 2016 (6,159 kg ha(-1)) and 2017 (5,633 kg ha(-1)) and second in 2018 (5,515 kg ha(-1)). Grain volume weights of Hilliard were similar to overall trial averages in the uniform southern (73.4-75.2 kg hl(-1)) and eastern (70-75.8 kg hl(-1)) nurseries. Hilliard has soft grain texture with flour softness equivalent values varying from 58.1 to 61.7 g 100 g(-1). Straight grade flour yields on a Quadrumat Senior mill varied from 66.8 to 68.4 g kg(-1). Flour protein concentration varied from 7.0 to 9.1 g 100 g(-1) and gluten strength from 108 to 128 g 100 g(-1), as measured by lactic acid solvent retention capacity. Cookie spread diameter varied from 18.3 to 18.6 cm. ; U.S. Wheat and Barley Scab InitiativeUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA) [59-0206-9-084]; Hatch Program of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) [59-0790-4-102]; USDA-ARS Specific Cooperative AgreementUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA)USDA Agricultural Research Service [58-6645-00-108]; NIFATriticeae Coordinated Agricultural Project [2011-68002-30029] ; U.S. Wheat and Barley Scab Initiative, Grant/Award Number: 59-0206-9-084; Hatch Program of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), Grant/Award Number: 59-0790-4-102; USDA-ARS Specific Cooperative Agreement, Grant/Award Number: 58-6645-00-108; NIFATriticeae Coordinated Agricultural Project, Grant/Award Number: 2011-68002-30029 ; Public domain authored by a U.S. government employee
BASE
In: Keywords 7
Introduces key terms, concepts, debates, and histories for Disability StudiesKeywords for Disability Studies aims to broaden and define the conceptual framework of disability studies for readers and practitioners in the field and beyond. The volume engages some of the most pressing debates of our time, such as prenatal testing, euthanasia, accessibility in public transportation and the workplace, post-traumatic stress, and questions about the beginning and end of life.Each of the 60 essays in Keywords for Disability Studies focuses on a distinct critical concept, including "ethics," "medicalization," "performance," "reproduction," "identity," and "stigma," among others. Although the essays recognize that "disability" is often used as an umbrella term, the contributors to the volume avoid treating individual disabilities as keywords, and instead interrogate concepts that encompass different components of the social and bodily experience of disability. The essays approach disability as an embodied condition, a mutable historical phenomenon, and a social, political, and cultural identity.An invaluable resource for students and scholars alike, Keywords for Disability Studies brings the debates that have often remained internal to disability studies into a wider field of critical discourse, providing opportunities for fresh theoretical considerations of the field's core presuppositions through a variety of disciplinary perspectives.Visit keywords.nyupress.org for online essays, teaching resources, and more