BOOK REVIEWS - American Politics - Designing Judicial Review: Interest Groups, Congress, and Communications Policy
In: American political science review, Band 93, Heft 4, S. 982
ISSN: 0003-0554
69 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: American political science review, Band 93, Heft 4, S. 982
ISSN: 0003-0554
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 60, Heft 4, S. 1211-1212
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: Political science research and methods: PSRM, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 438-444
ISSN: 2049-8489
AbstractDelegation is a well-known feature of policymaking in separation of powers systems. Yet despite the importance of this activity, there is little systematic evidence about how many major laws in the United States actually delegate policymaking authority to administrators in federal agencies. Using a database of agency regulatory activity along with text searches, we examine significant US federal enactments from 1947 to 2016 to see which of these laws delegate to agencies. We find that nearly all major laws—more than 99 percent—contain delegation. We also find that the number of agencies receiving delegation in each law has increased over time.
In: American journal of political science, Band 65, Heft 1, S. 21-35
ISSN: 1540-5907
AbstractWe put forward a new approach to studying issue definition within the context of policy diffusion. Most studies of policy diffusion—which is the process by which policymaking in one government affects policymaking in other governments—have focused on policy adoptions. We shift the focus to an important but neglected aspect of this process: the issue‐definition stage. We use topic models to estimate how policies are framed during this stage and how these frames are predicted by prior policy adoptions. Focusing on smoking restriction in U.S. states, our analysis draws upon an original data set of over 52,000 paragraphs from newspapers covering 49 states between 1996 and 2013. We find that frames regarding the policy's concrete implications are predicted by prior adoptions in other states, whereas frames regarding its normative justifications are not. Our approach and findings open the way for a new perspective to studying policy diffusion in many different areas.
SSRN
Working paper
Representation and governing in a separated system -- The historical development of Congress -- Elections -- Representation -- Committees -- Parties -- Policy making in the House and Senate -- The legislative effectiveness of Congress and its members : governing, policymaking, and the budget -- Congress and the President -- Congress and the bureaucracy -- Congress and the courts -- Congress and interest groups.
In: Political science research and methods: PSRM, Band 9, Heft 4, S. 760-778
ISSN: 2049-8489
AbstractWe developed a maximum likelihood estimator corresponding to the predicted hazard rate that emerges from a continuous time game of incomplete information with a fixed time horizon (i.e., Kreps and Wilson, 1982, Journal of Economic Theory27, 253–279). Such games have been widely applied in economics and political science and involve two players engaged in a war of attrition contest over some prize that they both value. Each player can be either a strong or weak competitor. In the equilibrium of interest, strong players do not quit whereas weak players play a mixed strategy characterized by a hazard rate that increases up to an endogenous point in time, after which only strong players remain. The observed length of the contest can therefore be modeled as a mixture between two unobserved underlying durations: one that increases until it abruptly ends at an endogenous point in time and a second involving two strong players that continues indefinitely. We illustrate this estimator by studying the durations of Senate filibusters and international crises.
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 81, Heft 3, S. 1057-1068
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 47, Heft 2, S. 468-476
ISSN: 1537-5935
ABSTRACTWhat factors inhibit or facilitate cross-subfield conversations in political science? This article draws on diffusion scholarship to gain insight into cross-subfield communication. Diffusion scholarship represents a case where such communication might be expected, given that similar diffusion processes are analyzed in American politics, comparative politics, and international relations. We identify nearly 800 journal articles published on diffusion within political science between 1958 and 2008. Using network analysis we investigate the degree to which three "common culprits"—terminology, methodological approach, and journal type—influence levels of integration. We find the highest levels of integration among scholars using similar terms to describe diffusion processes, sharing a methodological approach (especially in quantitative scholarship), and publishing in a common set of subfield journals. These findings shed light on when cross-subfield communication is likely to occur with ease and when barriers may prove prohibitive.
In: Congress and the presidency: an interdisciplinary journal of political science and history, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 1-24
ISSN: 0734-3469
In: Congress & the presidency, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 1-24
ISSN: 1944-1053
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 47, Heft 2, S. 468-476
ISSN: 0030-8269, 1049-0965
In: British journal of political science, Band 43, Heft 3, S. 673-701
ISSN: 1469-2112
Over the past fifty years, top political science journals have published hundreds of articles about policy diffusion. This article reports on network analyses of how the ideas and approaches in these articles have spread both within and across the subfields of American politics, comparative politics and international relations. Then, based on a survey of the literature, the who, what, when, where, how and why of policy diffusion are addressed in order to identify and assess some of the main contributions and omissions in current scholarship. It is argued that studies of diffusion would benefit from paying more attention to developments in other subfields and from taking a more systematic approach to tackling the questions of when and how policy diffusion takes place. Adapted from the source document.
In: British journal of political science, Band 43, Heft 3, S. 673-701
ISSN: 1469-2112
Over the past fifty years, top political science journals have published hundreds of articles about policy diffusion. This article reports on network analyses of how the ideas and approaches in these articles have spread both within and across the subfields of American politics, comparative politics and international relations. Then, based on a survey of the literature, the who, what, when, where, how and why of policy diffusion are addressed in order to identify and assess some of the main contributions and omissions in current scholarship. It is argued that studies of diffusion would benefit from paying more attention to developments in other subfields and from taking a more systematic approach to tackling the questions of when and how policy diffusion takes place.
In: British journal of political science, Band 43, Heft 3, S. 673-701
ISSN: 0007-1234