Suchergebnisse

The future effectiveness of the 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BWC) will be dependent largely on the introduction of an effective verification system. If such a system is to be effective, it will need to be underpinned by the expertise and reagents that have already been used to produce battlefield detectors for biological warfare (BW) agents. Samples for analysis could range from those taken from a fermenter vessel to samples taken from the environment surrounding the suspect facility. The analysis of such samples could be carried out in the field or at specialist laboratories. Specialist laboratories would offer a wider range of tests and a higher degree of test sensitivity; however, the problem of sample transport to the laboratory will need to be addressed. In the longer term, improved fieldable verification equipment could be developed.

Thränert, O.: The Biological Weapons Convention: its origins and evolution. S. 9-17. Beck, V. ; Salber, H.: The third review conference to the Biological Weapons Convention: results and experiences. S. 19-30. Ipsen, K.: The verification of the Biological Weapons Convention and international law. S. 31-37. Geissler, E.: Further measures to strengthen the Biological Weapons Convention. S. 39-54. Bernauer, T.: Verification of compliance with the Biological Weapons Convention: developing countries between passive participation and obstruction. S. 55-67. Johnston, W.R.: Examining alternatives for the verification of the Biological Weapons Convention. S. 69-73. Lundin, S.J.: Views on the verification possibilities to the Biological Weapons Convention. S. 75-82. Pearson, G.S.: Verification of the Biological Weapons Convention. S. 83-99. Roberts, B.: Implementing the Biological Weapons Convention: looking beyond the verification issue. S. 101-106. Appendix. S.107-146