Struktureller Konflikt?: Die Debatte um die neue Weltinformations- und -kommunikationsordnung ; neorealistische Hypothese zum Nord-Süd-Verhältnis
In: Tübinger Arbeitspapiere zur internationalen Politik und Friedensforschung, Nr. 23
84 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Tübinger Arbeitspapiere zur internationalen Politik und Friedensforschung, Nr. 23
World Affairs Online
In: International studies review, Band 24, Heft 3
ISSN: 1468-2486
A growing chorus of critics have called upon transnational nongovernmental organizations (TNGOs) from the Global North to "decolonize" their practices, to "shift the power" to the Global South, and to put an end to "white saviorism" by initiating a variety of significant organizational changes. Despite these repeated calls, the TNGO sector still struggles to reform. Explanations for TNGOs' ongoing struggles from within the field of international relations have generally centered on TNGOs themselves and the ironies and paradoxes of organizational growth and financial success. This article introduces a different argument that TNGOs' struggles to adapt in response to their critics are the result of TNGOs' "nonprofitness." By virtue of being nonprofit, TNGOs are embedded in an architecture consisting of forms and norms that inherently limit the extent to which they are able to change. Using the construct of the architecture, this article provides a novel account for the challenges that TNGOs confront as they attempt to close the gap between the rhetoric and reality of inclusive and transformational socioeconomic, political, or environmental change.
World Affairs Online
In: Public performance & management review, Band 42, Heft 1, S. 11-33
ISSN: 1557-9271
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 76, Heft 2, S. 252-262
ISSN: 0033-3352
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 76, Heft 2, S. 252-262
ISSN: 1540-6210
AbstractThe majority of the world's population resides in low‐ and middle‐income countries, where the problem of sustainable development is among the most pressing public administration challenges. As principal actors within the international development community, transnational nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) play a leading role in piloting a wide variety of development‐focused strategies. During the past decade, many of these transnational NGOs, along with the United Nations, have embraced a rights‐based approach (RBA) to development as an alternative to traditional service delivery. Despite the growing popularity of RBA among NGOs and other development actors, surprisingly little attention has been paid to understanding the significance of RBA for public administration and for public managers—the "other side of the coin." Drawing on current research in NGO studies and international development, this article describes several varieties of contemporary rights‐based approaches, analyzes their impact on development practices, and examines the intersection of RBA and public administration.
In: Public administration review: PAR
ISSN: 0033-3352
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 40, Heft 3, S. 487-504
ISSN: 0260-2105
World Affairs Online
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 40, Heft 3, S. 487-504
ISSN: 1469-9044
Scholarship has traditionally portrayed transnational NGOs (TNGOs) as 'principled' actors animated by global norms to advance human rights, sustainable development, humanitarian relief, environmental stewardship, and conflict resolution. However, scholarship has also identified instances in which TNGOs appear to act 'instrumentally' by engaging in resource-maximising behaviour seemingly inconsistent with their principled nature. Moreover, prior scholarship addressing this puzzle has been constrained by the limitations of small-n case studies examining relatively narrow subsectors of the TNGO community. Addressing these limitations, we reexamine the logic of TNGO behaviour in light of findings from an interdisciplinary, mixed-method research initiative consisting of in-depth, face-to-face interviews with a diverse sample of 152 top organisational leaders from all major sectors of TNGO activity. Using an inductive approach to discover how TNGO leaders understand their own behaviour, we introduce the heuristic of 'principled instrumentalism' and specify our framework with a formal model. Adapted from the source document.
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 40, Heft 3, S. 487-504
ISSN: 1469-9044
AbstractScholarship has traditionally portrayed transnational NGOs (TNGOs) as 'principled' actors animated by global norms to advance human rights, sustainable development, humanitarian relief, environmental stewardship, and conflict resolution. However, scholarship has also identified instances in which TNGOs appear to act 'instrumentally' by engaging in resource-maximising behaviour seemingly inconsistent with their principled nature. Moreover, prior scholarship addressing this puzzle has been constrained by the limitations of small-n case studies examining relatively narrow subsectors of the TNGO community. Addressing these limitations, we reexamine the logic of TNGO behaviour in light of findings from an interdisciplinary, mixed-method research initiative consisting of in-depth, face-to-face interviews with a diverse sample of 152 top organisational leaders from all major sectors of TNGO activity. Using an inductive approach to discover how TNGO leaders understand their own behaviour, we introduce the heuristic of 'principled instrumentalism' and specify our framework with a formal model.
In: International Journal of Human Rights, Band 14, Heft 3, S. 442-459
SSRN
In: International journal of human rights, Band 14, Heft 3, S. 442-459
ISSN: 1744-053X
In: Weltpolitik im 21. Jahrhundert 7
World Affairs Online
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of civil society, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 287-292
ISSN: 1744-8697
In: THE PERSISTENT POWER OF HUMAN RIGHTS: FROM COMMITMENT TO COMPLIANCE; edited by Thomas Risse, Stephen Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink, eds., Cambridge University Press, 2013
SSRN