Cyber Personhood
In early 2020, the rapid adoption of remote and communication tools by governments, businesses and individuals around the world increased their reliance on cyber infrastructure for the normal functioning of countries, businesses and businesses. And in some parts of society, the urgent need for communication, while protecting human life, takes precedence over ensuring that these communication tools are safe and resilient. However, the question is raised as to whether these tools should be considered important infrastructure or more important, depending on their tight inclusion in everyday life around the world. In many countries, the important importance of the environment to sustain human life has been recognized by extending the legal personality, or legal rights, to the environmental entity. Countries like Colombia, Ecuador, New Zealand and India have generally granted legal rights to various rivers, lakes, parks and nature. This article explores future possibilities and examples, allowing the country to consider granting legal rights to other very important institutions that are unrecognized. Human Life Looking to the future of becoming increasingly dependent on highly interdependent systems in cyberspace, could these systems be personalized? The impact of remote operations and cybersecurity can lead to a whole new perception of the importance of cyberspace dependence and, as a result, new legal treatment. Against the backdrop of extensive debate on cyberspace legislation, including the law of war, this is a more complex legal consideration, especially in the light of cross-border dependencies and systems affecting multiple jurisdictions. Is to raise. Through cyber biomimetics, this white paper adopts a blue-sky conceptual approach to study policy considerations and potential impacts when highly interdependent cyber systems in the distant future receive the same protection as environmental factors.