Suchergebnisse

THIS ARTICLE EXAMINES PUBLIC ATTITUDES TOWARDS TERRORISM IN FIVE COUNTRIES: URUGUAY, SPAIN, ITALY, GERMANY AND NORTHERN IRELAND. IT ANALYZES PUBLIC CONCERN OVER TERRORISM, IMAGES OF THE TERRORISTS, SUPPORT FOR THE TERRORISTS' GOALS, AND PUBLIC APPROVAL OF ANTI-TERRORIST MEASURES. THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NATIONALIST AND REVOLUTIONARY TERRORISM. NATIONALIST TERRORISTS HAVE A HIGH DEGREE OF SUPPORT FROM AN ETHNIC CONSTITUENCY, WHILE REVOLUTIONARY TERRORISTS ATTRACT A MUCH SMALLER DEGREE OF SUPPORT PRIMARILY FROM THE EDUCATED YOUNG. IT IS CONCLUDED THAT PUBLIC OPINION TOWARDS TERRORISM IS A PRODUCT OF COMPLEX HISTORICAL SITUATIONS, AND THAT PUBLIC ATTITUDES ARE UNAFFECTED BY THE TERRORIST CAMPAIGN ITSELF.

This flat report provides an overview of the ten individual reports that present the case studies. It gives the most comprehensive coverage of all materials and emphasises similarities and differences among case studies. All informations contained in this report comes from individual reports. The flat cross country comparison is a companion of the consolidated report (WP3 D10 P1) and is organised into five sections. The First Section outlines background information on the case studies. The Second Section presents the Agri Environmental Schemes (AESs) and gives an overview of institutional settings. Section Three focuses on the disigning period while Section Four deals with enforcement issues. Finally, Section Five addresses the environmental impacts; it integrates the outcome of the mid term evaluation. Additional information on institutional settings is given in a specific appendix.

Volkswirtschaftliche Kosten der Landflucht in die Ballungsräume. Absorptionskosten durch Investitionen zur Schaffung neuer Arbeitsplätze und von Infrastruktureinrichtungen in den Städten. Bereitstellung von städtischen Dienstleistungen. (DÜI-Seu)