Suchergebnisse

Humans and elephants have shared social, historical and ecological relations for ages. However, their coexistence has not been as pleasant as one would like that to be. Despite persistent efforts by several stakeholder to mitigate human-elephant conflict and foster coexistence, the problem refuses to wither away. People's perception also varies widely across the types of stakeholders. With this at the backdrop, this paper, drawing on qualitative empirical inputs, attempts to understand the plurality of stakeholders' connect with elephants, their perceptions, effectiveness of existing mitigation strategies and future of their coexistence. On the basis of interviews with key informants, focus group discussions among community members and Forest Department officials and field observations in one of the migratory elephant corridors of India, we also make a modest attempt to suggest participatory and community-based mitigation strategies.

Reintegrating wolves in human-dominated landscapes constitutes a significant conservation challenge. After decades of studying human-wolf interactions through a conflict lens, there is growing recognition that more nuanced perspectives are needed. However, this recognition has hitherto yielded few practical changes, and few have studied what underpins successful coexistence. Here we show that disproportionate focus on and resource allocation to conflict within conservation programmes risks undermining existing convivial relationships with large carnivores. Using a coexistence lens, we studied human-wolf interactions in Sanabria-La Carballeda in Spain; the region has one of the highest densities of wolves in Europe. We explored the underlying social and ecological conditions that have permitted both wolves and people to persist in the area, studied the mutual impacts, and surveyed how interactions are influenced by broader socio-economic processes. The findings of this novel approach to studying human-wildlife interactions elucidates how areas of functional coexistence have been neglected in policy, leaving them vulnerable to depopulation, low agricultural profitability, and the loss of biocultural diversity. When institutions fail to support functional coexistence, we risk losing the knowledge, the traditions and the trust of those who have sustained Europe's large carnivores, thereby undermining transitions to more convivial human-wildlife interactions in the future.

Living alongside predators can entail substantial costs both in terms of livelihoods and personal safety. Negative interactions with predators can lead to negative attitudes and behavioural intentions such as retaliatory or pre-emptive killing. As a result, conservation strategies are increasingly adopting human–wildlife coexistence approaches aimed at minimizing the costs associated with living with predators by providing direct or indirect benefits. This is done in the hope that people will foster positive attitudes and behavioural intentions towards predators. However, people's attitudes and their behavioural intentions are not necessarily linked, and both need to be understood for conservation actions to be effective. We conducted 747 semi-structured interviews with community members in the Maasai Mara, Kenya, to determine which factors influenced people's attitudes and behavioural intentions towards predators and whether the two were linked. Most interviewees (57.52%) had a positive attitude towards predators as measured by their assertion that people, livestock and predators should coexist. Their attitude was dependent on benefits, occupation, conservancy membership and perceived community ownership of predators, but was not influenced by the costs of livestock depredation. Most respondents who were members of a conservancy had positive attitudes towards predators but this differed by conservancy, suggesting that, in addition to benefits, conservation politics could influence attitudes. In total, 10.3% of respondents said that they would kill a predator if it killed their livestock. This behavioural intention was only influenced by the respondent's attitude. Understanding the factors that influence attitudes and behavioural intentions will aid future management and coexistence strategies.

Fostering coexistence between people and wildlife is crucial to both the conservation and restoration of wildlife populations across the globe. Yet, so far research exploring human-wildlife conflict and coexistence has been largely ahistorical, with little focus on the historical trajectories through which human-wildlife interactions have shifted from coexistence to conflicts which have led to wildlife eradication in the past. This paper responds by examining the historical drivers of change which disrupted a long history of human-wolf coexistence in Ireland. Drawing on an extensive review of primary historical sources and secondary literature and applying analytical tools from environmental history, the paper first illustrates the diverse practices and attitudes which helped sustain a continuous period of coexistence up to the seventeenth century. The paper then illustrates how coexistence unravelled during the early modern period following the island's integration into an expanding global capitalist system under a colonial regime who redefined Ireland as a primitive 'Wolf-land'. By engaging with the historical dimensions of human-wildlife interactions and drawing attention to how wildlife has become enrolled in past social conflicts, the article highlights the importance of historical perspectives for informing current strategies aimed at positively transforming human-wildlife conflict towards inclusive and socially just forms of coexistence.
Abstract in Irish: https://bit.ly/33kuqHY

Many carnivore populations were in decline throughout much of the 20th century, but due to recent conservation policies, their numbers are stabilising or even increasing in some areas of the world. This, compounded with human population growth, has caused increased livestock depredation by carnivores, which threatens farmer livelihoods, particularly those in developing countries such as Namibia. How to resolve this so-called "conflict" between carnivores and livestock farmers remains challenging, in part because some mitigation strategies have proven somewhat ineffective or unacceptable. By using a case-study approach on the commercial farmlands of northcentral Namibia, I aimed to understand the complexity of the human dimensions affecting coexistence between carnivores and people in an unprotected working landscape.

Batakovic, D.T.: The Serbian-Albanian conflict: an historical perspective. - S. 1-14. Grémaux, R.: Politics of ethnic domination in the land of the living past. - S. 15-23. Cirkovic, S.: Images of history: same objects, different perspectives. - S. 24-28. Berisha, I.: The Balkan syndrome of a surplus of history. - S. 29-33. Dogo, M.: National truths and disinformation in Albanian-Kosovar historiography. - S. 34-47. Tromp-Vrkic, N.: Kosovo and the disintegration of Yugoslavia. - S. 48-55. Kullashi, M.: The production of hatred in Kosova (1981-91). - S. 56-69. Blagojevic, M.: The other side of the truth: migrations of Serbs from Kosovo. - S. 70-81. Vasilijevic, V.A.: Human rights and the Kosovo crisis. - S. 82-90. Jansen, J.: Human rights abuses in Kosovo in the 1980s and the response from the West. - S. 91-94. Zajmi, G.: Kosova's constitutional position in the former Yugoslavia. - S. 95-101. Poulton, H.: The Albanian question in the Balkans. - S. 104-114. Maliqi, S.: Albanians between East and West. - S. 115-122. Vermeer, W.: Linguistics and politics: the origin of the Albanian language. - S. 123-132. Detrez, R.: Bulgarian attitudes towards the Kosovo question. - S. 133-141. Van Dartel, G.: A Catholic response to the Serbian Orthodox view on Kosovo. - S. 142-149 Pettan, S.: The Kosovo conflict through the eyes of local Rom (Gypsy) musicians. - S. 150-157. Hardten, E.: Administrative units and municipal reforms in Kosovo (1959-1992). - S. 158-170. Karan, M.: Kosovo: from tomorrow to yesterday. - S. 171-177. Vasic, M.: The return of the ethnic principle. - S. 180-184. Pula, G.: Solving the Kosova crisis peacefully: deference to the right to self-determination. - S. 185-192. Janjic, D.: Serbs and Albanians between war and dialogue. - S. 193-199. Agani, F.: Is a peaceful solution of the Kosova crisis possible? - S. 200-205

The range-wide decline of lions has led to their conservation becoming a top priority. Protection of free-ranging lion populations is dependent on securing space for lions but also on the ability and desire of local communities to coexist with lions. Our investigation takes a comparative and case study approach to explore the individual and societal desire to maintain current lion populations alongside communities in, or surrounding, Zimbabwe's Hwange National Park, Tanzania's Ruaha National Park, and Kenya's southern Maasailand. Using data from attitudinal questionnaire surveys, we compare the desire to maintain current lion populations as well as the prevalence and success of conservation interventions aimed at increasing human-lion coexistence. In Maasailand, 88% of the respondents expressed a desire to see current lion populations maintained, while only 42% of the respondents in Ruaha and only 5% of the respondents in Hwange expressed this desire. More respondents reported predation by lions (lion predation) on livestock in Maasailand than in Hwange; personal benefits from conservation were greatest in Maasailand; and exposure to conservation education was highest in Ruaha. The Hwange findings were confounded by Zimbabwe's political and economic climate. In Ruaha and Maasailand, communal and individual conservation benefits influenced desired changes to lion population. Once variation between sites was controlled for, twinning personal benefits and conservation education together was most likely to increase an individual's desire to see current lion populations maintained.