Suchergebnisse
Filter
57 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Treaties and State Law
In: The Death of Treaty Supremacy, S. 85-106
The Origins of Treaty Supremacy: 1776–1787
In: The Death of Treaty Supremacy, S. 17-28
Introduction: The Death of Treaty Supremacy: An Invisible Constitutional Change
In: D. Sloss, The Death of Treaty Supremacy: An Invisible Constitutional Change, Oxford University Press, 2016.
SSRN
Incorporation, Federalism, and International Human Rights
In: Forthcoming, Human Rights and Legal Judgments: The American Story (Austin Sarat ed., Cambridge Univ. Press 2017)
SSRN
Taming Madison's Monster: How to Fix Self-Execution Doctrine
In: Brigham Young University Law Review, Forthcoming
SSRN
How International Human Rights Transformed the U.S. Constitution
In: 37 Human Rights Quarterly, 2015
SSRN
Bond v. United States: Choosing the Lesser of Two Evils
In: 90 Notre Dame Law Review 1583 (2015)
SSRN
Polymorphous Public Law Litigation: The Forgotten History of Nineteenth Century Public Law Litigation
In: 71 Washington and Lee Law Review, (Nov 2014, Forthcoming)
SSRN
Working paper
Kiobel and Extraterritoriality: A Rule Without a Rationale
In: Maryland Journal of International Law, Forthcoming
SSRN
Executing Foster v. Neilson: the two-step approach to analyzing self-executing treaties
In: Harvard international law journal, Band 53, Heft 1, S. 135-188
ISSN: 0017-8063
World Affairs Online
Executing Foster v. Neilson: The Two-Step Approach to Analyzing Self-Executing Treaties
In: 53 Harvard International Law Journal 135 (2012)
SSRN
Judicial Foreign Policy: Lessons from the 1790s
SSRN
Working paper
Rasul v. Bush. 124 S.Ct. 2686
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 98, Heft 4, S. 788-798
ISSN: 2161-7953
United States v. Duarte-Acero
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 97, Heft 2, S. 411-418
ISSN: 2161-7953
In United States v. Duarte-Acero, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights does not regulate the extraterritorial conduct of U.S. government agents. Additionally, the court held that the Covenant is not self-executing and therefore that it does not create individual rights that are judicially enforceable in U.S. courts.