The Big Five Personality Traits in the Political Arena
In: Annual Review of Political Science, Band 14, S. 265-287
80 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Annual Review of Political Science, Band 14, S. 265-287
SSRN
In: American Politics Research, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 32-84
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
In: APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper
SSRN
Working paper
Frontmatter -- CONTENTS -- LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES -- PREFACE TO THE PAPERBACK EDITION -- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- UNHEALTHY POLITICS -- Introduction -- 1. The Medical Guesswork Problem -- 2. Sham Surgery -- 3. Doctor Knows Best -- 4. The Limits of Professional Self- Regulation -- 5. Zero-Credit Politics -- 6. Electoral Competition, Polarization, and the Breakdown of Elite- Led Social Learning -- Conclusion. -- APPENDIX TO CHAPTER 3 -- NOTES -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- INDEX
In: Political analysis: PA ; the official journal of the Society for Political Methodology and the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 435-455
ISSN: 1476-4989
The consolidation of polling places in the Vestal Central School District in New York State during the district's 2006 budget referendum provides a naturalistic setting to study the effects of polling consolidation on voter turnout on an electorate quite distinct from previous work by Brady and McNulty (2004, The costs of voting: Evidence from a natural experiment. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, Palo Alto, CA). In particular, voters in local elections are highly motivated and therefore might be thought to be less affected by poll consolidation. Nevertheless, through a matching analysis we find that polling consolidation decreases voter turnout substantially, by about seven percentage points, even among this electorate, suggesting that even habitual voters can be dissuaded from going to the polls. This finding has implications for how election administrators ought to handle cost-cutting measures like consolidation.
SSRN
In: American politics research, Band 47, Heft 5, S. 1081-1099
ISSN: 1552-3373
Proparticipatory norms play a central role in driving turnout. However, a broad norm that people are supposed to vote cannot explain why some people fail to participate or why rates of participation vary sharply across elections. We argue that the norm of voting extends beyond the mere act of voting. We present empirical evidence supporting the position that the social rewards for participating are conditional. The social rewards for casting an ill-informed vote are far smaller than those associated with casting an informed ballot. Moreover, some low-information voting strategies are viewed as less desirable than simply abstaining. Our findings illustrate an important constraint on the capacity of social norms to foster turnout. The effectiveness of efforts to translate norms into higher rates of turnout may depend on ensuring that voters are informed enough to cast a meaningful ballot.
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 79, Heft 3, S. 1095-1100
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: British journal of political science, Band 46, Heft 2, S. 241-264
ISSN: 1469-2112
This article measures the social rewards and sanctions associated with voting. A series of survey experiments shows that information about whether a person votes directly affects how favorably that person is viewed. Importantly, the study also compares the rewards and sanctions associated with voting to other activities, including the decisions to recycle, volunteer and return one's library books on time. It presents a behavioral test of the consequences of non-voting and finds that individuals are willing to take costly action in a dictator game to reward political participation. Finally, it shows that survey measures of social norms about voting are correlated with county-level voter turnout. The study adds to the growing literature documenting the important influence of social concerns on turnout and other political choices.
In: British journal of political science, Band 46, Heft 2, S. 1-24
ISSN: 0007-1234
In: American politics research, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 54-75
ISSN: 1552-3373
Recent research demonstrates growing scholarly interest in the relationship between personality characteristics and political attitudes and behaviors. In this article we present analysis using data from a national panel survey conducted in two waves-the first prior to the 2010 U.S. midterm election, the second after it. We assess the stability of a variety of personality measures and find high correlations between the pre- and postelection measures. We also leverage the fact that Republicans made substantial gains in Congress in the 2010 election to determine whether various personality measures are affected by the intersection of partisan attachments and political events and find little evidence that they are. The findings provide encouraging evidence for those interested in examining the relationship between personality and political attitudes using survey data. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright holder.]
In: British journal of political science, Band 43, Heft 1, S. 77-102
ISSN: 1469-2112
Do people believe the votes they cast are truly secret? Novel items added to a nationally representative survey show that 25 per cent of respondents report not believing their ballot choices are kept secret and over 70 per cent report sharing their vote choices with others. These findings suggest that standard models of candidate choice should account for the potential effects of doubts about ballot secrecy. Consistent with this view, regression analysis shows that social forces appear to have a greater effect on vote choices among people who doubt the formal secrecy of the ballot. This analysis supports the broader claim that the intended benefits of institutional rules may not be realized if people's perceptions of these rules differ from their formal characteristics. Adapted from the source document.
In: American politics research, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 54-75
ISSN: 1532-673X
In: British journal of political science, Band 43, Heft 1, S. 77-102
ISSN: 1469-2112
Do people believe the votes they cast are truly secret? Novel items added to a nationally representative survey show that 25 per cent of respondents report not believing their ballot choices are kept secret and over 70 per cent report sharing their vote choices with others. These findings suggest that standard models of candidate choice should account for the potential effects of doubts about ballot secrecy. Consistent with this view, regression analysis shows that social forces appear to have a greater effect on vote choices among people who doubt the formal secrecy of the ballot. This analysis supports the broader claim that the intended benefits of institutional rules may not be realized if people's perceptions of these rules differ from their formal characteristics.