Suchergebnisse

Chapter 1. What is true education? -- Chapter 2. -- Machine education -- Chapter 3. Educational cramming -- Chapter 4. Fashionable education -- Chapter 5. Practical education -- Chapter 6. Self-culture -- Chapter 7. The Observing faculties -- Chapter 8. Making homes and schools pleasant -- Chapter 9. Play life -- Chapter 10. Pastimes and amusements -- Chapter 11. The Influence of home example -- Chapter 12. How should children be treated? -- Chapter 13. Government -- Chapter 14. Punishments -- Chapter 15. How to get work out of children -- Chapter 16. Moral culture -- Chapter 17. Physical nurture -- Chapter 18. Too early at school -- Chapter 19. Training for life's duties -- Chapter 20. Universal education necessary -- Chapter 21. Normal development . ; Mode of access: Internet.

AbstractIn the media, during sporting events, in online forums, and in interpersonal interactions, whites often portray Black people as animals, especially as apes or monkeys. In this essay we consider what contemporary research on prejudice in American politics has to say about these dehumanizing portrayals of Black people. We argue that contemporary political science work has not done enough to understand both the historical roots and the continuing practices of whites' dehumanization of Black people, to the detriment of an accurate understanding of racial attitudes in the United States. To rectify this omission, we draw on the work of historians to map out a brief overview of race‐making and the dehumanizing attitudes that shaped this process. Then, we review political science literature on contemporary white attitudes toward Black people, emphasizing connections between prevailing conceptions of these attitudes and long‐standing processes of dehumanization. We conclude by charting directions for future scholarship; we seek to unsettle the mainstream of a subfield dominated by mild conceptions of racial attitudes.

Not available. ; Este estudio procura poner de manifiesto la influencia de Blanco White, redactor de El Español (Londres, 1810-1814), en el ideario político de Bolívar, comparando el Manifiesto de Cartagena, la Carta de Jamaica y el Discurso de Angostura con los artículos de Blanco. Después de precisar las relaciones personales del periodista con el Libertador en Londres, se cotejan los textos y se muestra cómo Bolívar se inspiró en el periódico y lo utilizó en un doble sentido: subversivo, con objeto de justificar la lucha anticolonialista, y conservador, para analizar las dificultades de la independencia y de la democracia e imaginar el tipo de gobierno de los nacientes estados.

In double columns. ; Caption title. ; Electronic reproduction. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; 44