Trade costs and agricultural trade in Central Asia
In: Discussion paper No. 146
13010 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Discussion paper No. 146
In: Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 145-163, April 2010
SSRN
In: Discussion paper series 766
In: The Canadian journal of economics: the journal of the Canadian Economics Association = Revue canadienne d'économique, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 292-319
ISSN: 1540-5982
Abstract. While transport costs have fallen, the empirical evidence also points at rising total trade costs. In a model of industry location with endogenous transaction costs that seeks to replicate features from the machinery industry, we show how and under which conditions a decline in transport costs can lead to an increase in the total cost of trade. The subtle relationship between (endogenous) transport costs and the sensitivity of trade to distance is also explored.
SSRN
In: The Economic Journal, Band 105, Heft 433, S. 1488
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 39, Heft 12, S. 2069-2079
Cover -- Effective Trade Costs and the Current Account: An Empirical Analysis -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Measurement and Aggregation -- 3 Trade Barriers and the Current Account -- 4 Deconstructing the Importer-Specific Component of Barriers -- 5 Conclusions -- Appendix: Description of Other Variables in the CA Regression -- References
This paper develops a quantitative model of trade, military conflicts, and defense spending. Trade liberalization between two countries reduces probability of an armed conflict between them, causing both to cut defense spending. This in turn causes a domino effect on defense spending by other countries. As a result, both countries and the rest of the world are better off. We estimate the model using data on trade, conflicts, and military spending. We find that, after reduction of costs of trade between a pair of hostile countries, the welfare effect of worldwide defense spending cuts is comparable in magnitude to the direct welfare gains from trade.
BASE
This paper develops a quantitative model of trade, military conflicts, and defense spending. Trade liberalization between two countries reduces probability of an armed conict between them, causing both to cut defense spending. This in turn causes a domino effect on defense spending by other countries. As a result, both countries and the rest of the world are better off. We estimate the model using data on trade, conflicts, and military spending. We find that, after reduction of costs of trade between a pair of hostile countries, the welfare effect of worldwide defense spending cuts is comparable in magnitude to the direct welfare gains from trade.
BASE
In: Aid for trade at a glance 2015
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: The World Economy, Band 37, Heft 1, S. 14-41
SSRN