Suchergebnisse

ACTION MEANS ACTION WITH RESPECT TO TEXTS. ON OCCASIONS WHEN ONE CAN SENSE OTHER INTERESTS AT WORK, THE EFFECT IS VERY CURIOUS. IN A POLEMICAL EXCHANGE, FOR INSTANCE, BETWEEN A MARXIST CRITIC AND A POSTSTRUCTURALIST, ONE MAY KNOW WHAT SORT OF EVENT IS BEING STAGED; BUT, AS ONE LISTENS TO THE PRESENTATIONS, AND COMPARES THE ELOQUENCE ON BOTH SIDES WITH ITS APPARENT SUBJECT, ONE SEES THAT CRITICISM IS NOT THE POINT AT ALL. THEY ARE REALLY ARGUING ABOUT SOMETHING ELSE-A SOCIAL QUESTION OF SOME KIND-THOUGH NEITHER KNOWS IT YET. SKEPTICS LIKE TO REPLY THAT THE UNDERGROUND QUALITY OF SUCH ENCOUNTERS IS A SIGN OF A HOPELESS CULTURAL MOMENT.

Annotation

A characterization of the American proletarian novel of the 1930's, based upon W. B. Rideout's The Radical Novel in in the United States, 1900-1954. Some of the works of I. K. Friedman, Upton Sinclair, Jack London, Robert Cantwell & others are reviewed in tracing & contrasting the emphases of the Socialist & the proletarian novel. In the latter the Mc has ceased to present itself as the intelligent guide to a better society, the faith in parliamentary change is gone, & a coming struggle for power is predicted. The strike & the conversion to the proletarian cause are the most common themes of the proletarian novel, as they were of the earlier Socialist novel. In most cases the novels end in violence & defeat for the workers, whereas actually labor scored one success after the other in the depression yrs. Such as it was, the proletarian novel flourished in the first half of the depression decade & dwindled away during the later Popular Front days. The most intelligent proletarian novelists did not entirely believe that America had a proletariat - a uniform Lc with a collective will & the capacity for concerted action. Rideout defines as `radical' any novel that advocates that the system be fundamentally changed. This leads him into an arbitrariness of choice which forces him to accept, on his own grounds, pretty much the Communist dogmas on what is radical & what is not. J. A. Fishman.

Excerpted from his work, "Terrorism in the United States and the potential threat to nuclear facilities." Particularly new groups in the Northeast. Revolutionary Armed Task Force, United Freedom Front, Armed Resistance Unit.

This article aims to reveal the dynamic factors of glocal radicalism, the tendency of superiority in the global structure, and the strategies to address the problem of glocal radicalism. Tracing the local and global context in analyzing the phenomenon of radicalism in Islam is important because both are the main variables so that this phenomenon can be comprehensively understood. This writing is qualitative research focuses on analyzing written sources about the facts of radicalism in global and local structures using analysis-interpretive methods and digital data analysis techniques. In this way, it is found that the dynamic factors of local radicalism are indirectly part of the structure of global radicalism, born of or as an implication of the systematic propaganda of that structure, namely structural violence in the dynamics and dialectics of global forces that influence social, political, and economical processes of Islamic countries. There is a tendency for superior that is reflected in the Islamophobia phenomenon and global political reflection. In this case, the moral-based multiculturalism educational approach and the virtual approach have a strategic role to address this problem Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengungkapkan faktor dinamis radikalisme glokal, kecenderungan superioritas dalam struktur global, serta strategi untuk menyikapi problem radikalisme glokal. Penelusuran konteks lokal dan global dalam menganalisis fakta radikalisme dalam Islam menjadi penting sebab keduanya merupakan variabel utama sehingga fakta tersebut dapat dipahami secara komprehensif. Tulisan merupakan penelitian kualitatif yang memokuskan pada telaah sumber tertulis tentang fakta radikalisme dalam struktur global dan lokal dengan metode analisis-interpretatif dan teknik analisis data digital. Dengan cara demikian, ditemukan bahwa faktor dinamis radikalisme lokal secara tidak langsung menjadi bagian dari struktur radikalisme global, lahir dari atau sebagai implikasi dari propaganda sistematis dari struktur tersebut, yaitu kekerasan struktural dalam dinamika dan dialektika kekuatan-kekuatan global yang memengaruhi proses sosial, politik, dan ekonomi negara-negara Islam. Terdapat kecenderungan superiorisme yang tercermin dalam fenomena islamofobia dan refleksi politik global. Dalam hal ini, pendekatan pendidikan multikulturalisme berbasis moral serta pendekatan virtual memiliki peran strategis untuk menyikapi problem ini.

This item is part of the Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements (PRISM) digital collection, a collaborative initiative between Florida Atlantic University and University of Central Florida in the Publication of Archival, Library & Museum Materials (PALMM).