Difference in diversity: multiple perspectives on multicultural, intercultural, and transcultural conceptual complexities
In: Journal of multicultural discourses, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 1-21
ISSN: 1747-6615
1481 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of multicultural discourses, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 1-21
ISSN: 1747-6615
Part 1: What is culture? 1. Dynamic definition of culture 2. Where does culture come from? 3. Cultural identity Part 2: Acquiring knowledge: the science behind culture 4. Measuring cultural differences 5. Working with the Model of Geert Hofstede 6. Working with the model of Richard Lewis Part 3: Learning competences: intercultural communication 7. Cultural aspects of communication 8. Effective communication with other cultures 9. Recognizing hidden cultural communication 10. Dealing with cultural conflicts
Intercultural Communication examines culture as a variable in interpersonal and collective communication. It explores the opportunities and problems arising from similarities and differences in communication patterns, processes, and codes among various cultural groups. It explores cultural universals, social categorization, stereotyping and discrimination, with a focus on topics including race, ethnicity, social class, religion, gender and sexuality as they relate to communication.
BASE
In: The Journal of social psychology, Band 98, Heft 1, S. 135-136
ISSN: 1940-1183
In: Intercultural education, Band 29, Heft 3, S. 321-339
ISSN: 1469-8439
In: Internationales Asien-Forum: international quarterly for Asian studies, Band 35, Heft 3-4, S. 295-306
ISSN: 0020-9449
World Affairs Online
In: Routledge research in international and comparative education
Introduction : interculturality for whom? -- Epistemological privilege in intercultural education : from cultural differences to a colonial difference -- The construction of a European identity in European Union policies on interculturality -- Intercultural studies and the commitment to bridging otherness -- The double bind of interculturality in academic textbooks -- Interculturalidad, or voices from the underside of the colonial difference -- Conclusion
World Affairs Online
In: Intercultural communication, Band 20, Heft 3, S. 17-30
ISSN: 1404-1634
This study aims to explore cultural differences between Thais and Spaniards in the classroom setting to identify problems caused by cultural differences and propose guidelines for coping with those issues. We interviewed forty Thai university students majoring in Spanish and ten Spanish teachers working in Thai universities about their expectations and experiences with regards to teachers' and students' behaviors and interactions in the classroom. The results highlighted the two cultures' stark differences in power distance, individualism and expressiveness and revealed insights that can help international teachers cope with the learning disposition of students from hierarchical, collectivist, and reserved cultures.
In: Internationales Asien-Forum: international quarterly for Asian studies, Band 35, Heft 3/4, S. 295-306
ISSN: 0020-9449
Introduction 1. Communicating in intercultural spaces 2. Origins of intercultural communication 3. Perception and cultural lenses 4. Language, symbols, and context 5. The dark side of differences 6. Cultural transitions and identity 7. Intercultural communication competence 8. Learning and living in a culturally diverse world. Appendices
In: The international journal of conflict management: IJCMA, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 72-90
ISSN: 1044-4068
Examines how intercultural negotiating differences are evidenced communicatively. Previous research suggests that negotiators deal differently with internationals than domestics. A simuluation exercise was conducted to test the endurance of culturally associated negotiation styles in intercultural negotiations between Americans & Taiwanese (N = 94 undergraduate students). Results suggest that culture does exert some global effects in face-to-face encounters with cultural outsiders. Other aspects of negotiation are managed locally, so that predicted cultural differences do not emerge in interaction. 3 Tables, 2 Appendixes, 76 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: Intercultural communication, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 1-18
ISSN: 1404-1634
This study examines the personal opinions of Chinese employees working in a multicultural environment on the relationship between cultural diversity and the efficacy of their communication in a multicultural environment. To better understand the connection between cultural background and efficient business communication, we conducted a questionnaire survey in 2014 among 20 employees from a Chinese subsidiary of a European top global manufacturing company. Analyses showed that even if the respondents expressed negative effects of cultural differences on communication, they also manifested positive attitudes toward intercultural interactions. Moreover, ignoring or even disrespecting the different cultural values of interactants were regarded as basic barriers in intercultural communication, and such barriers can be avoided when a different cultural background is respected. Although cultural differences were considered to hinder the respondents' performance and often to be a source of dissatisfaction, they did not discourage them from entering into intercultural communication.
In: Group processes & intergroup relations: GPIR, Band 17, Heft 2, S. 252-271
ISSN: 1461-7188
Although previous research has theorized about team interaction differences between the German and U.S. cultures, actual behavioral observations of such differences are sparse. This study explores team meetings as a context for examining intercultural differences. We analyzed a total of 5,188 meeting behaviors in German and U.S. student teams. All teams discussed the same task to consensus. Results from behavioral process analyses showed that German teams focused significantly more on problem analysis, whereas U.S. teams focused more on solution production. Moreover, U.S. teams showed significantly more positive socioemotional meeting behavior than German teams. Finally, German teams showed significantly more counteractive behavior such as complaining than U.S. teams. We discuss theoretical and pragmatic implications for understanding these observable differences and for improving interaction in intercultural teams.