In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 41, Heft 3, S. 335-348
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 41, Heft 3, S. 402-418
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 41, Heft 3, S. 436-450
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 41, Heft 4, S. 490-506
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 41, Heft 4, S. 522-537
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 89-107
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 124-137
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 41, Heft 2, S. 192-206
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 41, Heft 2, S. 207-223
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 41, Heft 5, S. 652-666
This article brings the case of the Kurdish referendum for independence into the wider literature on independence referendums. It examines the decision to hold an independence referendum and explores the pre-referendum conditions and the post-referendum consequences. The article argues that the referendum in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq was held due to internal political competition and party politics rather than the ripeness of the timing for independence. Theoretically, this article adds a new dimension to the scholarship on independence referendums, as it demonstrates that the purposes of independence referendums can go beyond the question put to the population – such as consolidating popular support by connecting to the population's nationalist desires, despite independence not being a realistic prospect. Finally, it brings further support for previous findings of the importance of international support for independence referendums.
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 41, Heft 5, S. 667-680
For some separatist movements, interim agreements offer a possible route to recognized statehood. However, such agreements require these movements to compromise on their demand for immediate independence and risk the preservation of the joint state. How is this reconciled with their claim to self-determination and how is it received by the community they claim to represent? This article examines four post-Cold War cases where an interim agreement has been accepted (New Caledonia, Bougainville, Montenegro and South Sudan). It finds that interim agreements are more easily accepted when the community is significantly divided on the issue of independence and when an inclusive and flexible construction of the community predominates. Somewhat paradoxically, this suggests that new states are more likely to emerge in cases without a determined, cohesive, ethnically defined demand for independence.
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 41, Heft 5, S. 622-637
The right of peoples to self-determination lies at the heart of the modern quest for statehood. This century-old principle warrants a world of true nation-states, where national boundaries make state borders, not the other way around. I argue, however, that the concept of 'self-determination' has been effectively (ab)used to foil, rather than foster, its original goal, and explain why and how this paradox transpired. In theory, self-determination is a potent 'speech-act': by uttering, en masse, their demand for self-determination, people(s) can change their politics, even create new states. In practice, however, powerful actors have tried to tame self-determination – by appropriating this right from the peoples, and delimiting its applicability to oppressed, non-ethnic communities and to substate solutions. In the tradition of conceptual history, this paper traces the dialectal process through which 'self-determination' evolved, from its Enlightenment inception, through its communist politicization, to its liberal universalization and its current predicament.
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 42, Heft 2, S. 149-163
This article describes three analyses of ethnographic interviews conducted with violent and nonviolent political activists. The findings show that the deliberations of violent and nonviolent activists focus on state violence and rational choice calculations (Studies I and II), while nonviolent activists moreover consider perceptions of themselves and state actors, among other factors (Study II). In a highly repressive setting, nonviolent activists choose individual over collective resistance (Study III). By revealing how violent and nonviolent activists reason about their behaviour, the findings complement statistical analyses of datasets on external factors, such as economic conditions, political institutions, social networks or political events. Such datasets are typically readily available or can be constructed from publicly available data, while interview transcripts are more time-consuming to assemble. Furthermore, replicable quantitative methods are not straightforwardly applied to qualitative interviews. This article instead applies Spradley's ethnographic analysis (Study I) and Corbin and Strauss's grounded theory (Studies II and III) to examine interview transcripts. In addition to the substantive findings, the analyses make a methodological contribution to qualitative studies of interviews by systematically identifying each factor addressed by an interview transcript.
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 42, Heft 2, S. 197-212
This article analyses democracy in post-communist Croatia 1990–1999 and 2000–2011. During the first decade, political stagnation occurred under a competitive authoritarian regime. This ended abruptly and there was a critical juncture, during which a free and fair election marked the start of Croatian democracy in 2000. I first propose a causal chain to explain the election results, suggesting that the occurrence of the election, combined with other necessary factors, revealed the population's underlying preference for democracy. Internally, this preference then served as a positive feedback mechanism throughout Croatia's rapid increase in democracy as it became a candidate for European Union membership and finalized accession negotiations. Externally, the European Union influenced democratic progress, particularly via conditionality policies. This historical comparative analysis aims to explain which factors allowed for a rapid increase in democratic quality, positioning the 2000 election results as the main influence.
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 42, Heft 2, S. 179-196
In this study, we argue that ethnic inclusiveness is an important democratic norm that fosters interstate peace. When two states are socialized into the notion of ethnic tolerance, they acquire the ability to reach cooperative arrangements in time of crisis. Based on cross-national time-series data analysis covering the period 1950–2001, we illustrate how two states that are inclusive of their politically relevant ethnic groups are less likely to experience interstate disputes than states that remain exclusive. This finding was robust, regardless of sample size, intensity of the dispute, model specification, or estimation method. Therefore, we believe in the existence of ethnic peace: ethnic inclusiveness represents an unambiguous force for democratic peace.