30 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Administrative theory & praxis: ATP ; a quarterly journal of dialogue in public administration theory, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 663-695
ISSN: 1949-0461
In: American review of public administration: ARPA, Band 30, Heft 3, S. 225-251
ISSN: 1552-3357
The author argues that conditions of subordination limit opportunities for citizen participation and discourse and alter the forms and meanings of each. In her view, open participation in the forms recognized as conventional, virtuous, and authentic is often neither possible nor wise. The author offers James Scott's work as a potential rejoinder to those who would require virtue of the nonapathetic and as an answer to Fox and Miller's question, "Why bother attending a discourse where claims are as likely to be counterfeit as authentic?" Using Scott's analysis of hidden transcripts as a point of theoretical departure, the author explores the impact of Fox and Miller's warrants for discourse on perceptions of participation and dissent. She suggests that to be more fully inclusive, theorists might reconceptualize the ends of deliberative discourse and reconsider the place of Habermasian warrants in achieving them.
In: American review of public administration: ARPA, Band 30, Heft 3, S. 225-251
ISSN: 0275-0740
In: American review of public administration: ARPA, Band 30, Heft 3, S. 225-251
ISSN: 0275-0740
In: Administrative theory & praxis: ATP ; a quarterly journal of dialogue in public administration theory, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 663-695
ISSN: 1084-1806
In: Public Productivity & Management Review, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 220
In: International journal of public administration, Band 28, Heft 11-12, S. 929-942
ISSN: 1532-4265
In: Administrative theory & praxis: ATP ; a quarterly journal of dialogue in public administration theory, Band 46, Heft 1, S. 13-34
ISSN: 1949-0461
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 63, Heft 1, S. 105-111
ISSN: 1540-6210
This essay invites reflection on four practical uses of rhetoric: as a way to provide persuasive emphasis in administrative communication; as a technique of analysis to improve public administration and expand its limits; as a resource in identifying individual administrative signature; and as a vehicle for reevaluating public administration's group signature. It reflects on the authors' experiences and considers possibilities for change toward more conscious and effective group self–representations.
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 63, Heft 1, S. 105-111
ISSN: 0033-3352
In: American review of public administration: ARPA, Band 30, Heft 3, S. 221-224
ISSN: 1552-3357
In: American review of public administration: ARPA, Band 30, Heft 3, S. 221-224
ISSN: 0275-0740
In: American review of public administration: ARPA, Band 30, Heft 3, S. 221-224
ISSN: 0275-0740
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 49, Heft 4, S. 362
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Public Productivity & Management Review, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 240