Realizing sovereignty
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 3-20
ISSN: 0260-2105
42 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 3-20
ISSN: 0260-2105
In: Alternatives: global, local, political, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 23-52
ISSN: 0304-3754
In: Alternatives: global, local, political, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 23-51
ISSN: 2163-3150
In: Global dialogues
In: non Eurocentric visions of the global
In: RIPE Series in Global Political Economy
Challenges the powerful and pervasive ideas concerning political economy, international relations, and ethics in the modern world. This title provides a fundamental cultural critique of political economy and critically describes the nature of the mainstream understanding of economics
In: RIPE series in global political economy
Challenges the powerful and pervasive ideas concerning political economy, international relations, and ethics in the modern world. This title provides a fundamental cultural critique of political economy and critically describes the nature of the mainstream understanding of economics.
In: Global horizons, Volume 1
In: Global horizons series
International Relations and the Problem of Difference has developed out of the sense that IR as a discipline does not assess the quality of cultural interactions that shape, and are shaped by, the changing structures and processes of the international system. In this work, the authors re-imagine IR as a uniquely placed site for the study of differences as organized explicitly around the exploration of the relation of wholes and parts and sameness and difference-and always the one in relation to the other.
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
"Units, Markets, Relations, and Flow: Beyond Interacting Parts to Unfolding Wholes" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: Contexto internacional, Band 37, Heft 3, S. 889-911
ISSN: 1982-0240
In: Journal of international relations and development, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 290-315
ISSN: 1581-1980
In: International studies perspectives: ISP, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 164-175
ISSN: 1528-3585
In: Journal of international relations and development: JIRD, official journal of the Central and East European International Studies Association, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 290-315
ISSN: 1408-6980
In: International studies perspectives: a journal of the International Studies Association, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 164-176
ISSN: 1528-3577
In: European journal of international relations, Band 8, Heft 1, S. 103-137
ISSN: 1460-3713
Since the putative end of the Cold War, modernization is increasingly reimagined as a global process— as an expanding liberal zone of peace, a global civil society, or as emerging forms of global governance. Thus, new forms of modernization theory, what we call neo-modernization, have emerged as important theories of International Relations (IR). Such a convergence of events and theory permit us to examine the logical overlap between IR and modernization theory. IR fails to herald a unique contribution to social theory because it persistently avoids and denies the historical problem from which it surfaces, namely, the problem of what to do about cultural difference. Modernization theory provides an essential contribution to IR's avoidance of this central problem. While modernization theory implicitly relies on IR's freezing of difference into geopolitical containers, it also projects a natural and universal developmental sequence through which all cultures must pass. In this way modernization theory anticipates the eventual total homogenizing of difference into sameness. Surprisingly, while partners with IR in the joint venture to contain and then eradicate difference, modernization theory also offers an alternative vision. This recessive theme, what we call an ethnological politics of comparison, has the potential to transform IR into the science and art of facing, understanding and addressing difference.