Fin de Siècle Federalism: The Supreme Court and the Redistribution of Constitutional Power
In: Perspectives on political science, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 102-109
ISSN: 1930-5478
45 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Perspectives on political science, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 102-109
ISSN: 1930-5478
In: Perspectives on political science, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 102
ISSN: 1045-7097
In: Politics and the life sciences: PLS ; a journal of political behavior, ethics, and policy, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 122-123
ISSN: 1471-5457
In: Politics and the life sciences: PLS ; a journal of political behavior, ethics, and policy, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 285-286
ISSN: 1471-5457
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 111
ISSN: 0033-3352
In: American political science review, Band 83, Heft 3, S. 998-998
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 82, Heft 2, S. 611-612
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: Politics and the life sciences: PLS ; a journal of political behavior, ethics, and policy, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 248-249
ISSN: 1471-5457
In: Politics and the life sciences: PLS, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 248-249
ISSN: 0730-9384
In: Teaching Political Science, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 174-178
In: American political science review, Band 80, Heft 2, S. 653-654
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: News for Teachers of Political Science, Band 48, S. 10-11
ISSN: 2689-8632
The emergence within the past two decades of implementation as a distinct subject for analysis has been an important development in both public administration and policy studies. Since the Pressman and Wildavsky study of the activities of the Economic Development Administration in Oakland, there has been a steady stream of books and articles presenting case studies of implementation or suggesting methodological approaches for understanding the process or for improving it. Despite this growth in the literature, the teacher of implementation continues to be without broad conceptual frameworks for presenting the available material. The teaching of implementation remains an eclectic endeavor because of the lack of viable theory. Indeed a major writer in the area has urged scholars to focus on providing policy relevant data because he can not foresee at this time the development of generally applicable theory. I shall argue here that the conceptual failings of the study of implementation can be traced to its origins as a separate area for study and that an understanding of these limitations may point the way toward better theoretical structures.
In: Teaching political science, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 174
ISSN: 0092-2013
In: American political science review, Band 79, Heft 4, S. 1267-1268
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 78, Heft 1, S. 209-210
ISSN: 1537-5943