Britain: Anatomy of a Eurosceptic state
In: Journal of European integration: Revue d'intégration européenne, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 15-33
ISSN: 1477-2280
100 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of European integration: Revue d'intégration européenne, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 15-33
ISSN: 1477-2280
In: Political geography: an interdisciplinary journal for all students of political studies with an interest in the geographical and spatial aspects, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 91-93
ISSN: 0962-6298
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 401-404
ISSN: 1477-7053
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 401-403
ISSN: 0017-257X
In: European access: the current awareness bulletin to the policies and activities of the European Communities, Heft 6, S. 12-13
ISSN: 0264-7362, 1362-458X
In: Journal of European public policy, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 45-62
ISSN: 1466-4429
In: Regionalism and World Order, S. 21-54
In: European access: the current awareness bulletin to the policies and activities of the European Communities, Heft 3, S. 7-8
ISSN: 0264-7362, 1362-458X
In: Politics, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 43-47
ISSN: 1467-9256
In this reply to Buller's article, Stephen George argues that although the comments made about the 'awkward partner thesis' are a valid critique of some common assumptions found in the media, they do not represent his position accurately; also that Buller's critique of explanations of British governments' attitudes to the EC which concentrate on institutions cannot be made of the domestic politics approach that he has adopted.
In: International affairs, Band 71, Heft 1, S. 167-167
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: Politics, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 43-47
ISSN: 0263-3957
A reply to Jim Buller's article (1995 [see abstract 9713229]) describing GB's relations with the European Union argues that the comments made about the "awkward partner thesis" are a valid critique of some common assumptions found in the media, but they do not represent Stephen George's (1990) position accurately. Buller's critique of explanations of British government attitudes toward the European Union, which concentrate on institutions, is not supported by the domestic politics approach he has adopted. 8 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: International affairs, Band 70, Heft 2, S. 359-360
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 531, Heft 1, S. 44-55
ISSN: 1552-3349
Adaptation by the British governmental elite to membership in the European Community has been slow and has been hampered by domestic political constraints. This article examines the problems of adaptation under the Thatcher and Major governments. The political sovereignty dimension, the U.K. budget contribution, British public opinion, and EC farm policy were central issues that London was to bring to the front burner of Community activity. The overriding problem of Maastricht in recent years has divided both the populace and the elites.
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 531 (Janua, S. 44
ISSN: 0002-7162
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Heft 531, S. 44-55
ISSN: 0002-7162
World Affairs Online