Do People Believe Combined Hazards Can Present Synergistic Risks
In: Risk analysis: an international journal, Band 32, Heft 5
ISSN: 1539-6924
20 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Risk analysis: an international journal, Band 32, Heft 5
ISSN: 1539-6924
In: Risk analysis: an international journal, Band 32, Heft 5, S. 801-815
ISSN: 1539-6924
The risk attributable to some hazard combinations can be greater than the sum of the risk attributable to each constituent hazard. Such "synergistic risks" occur in several domains, can vary in magnitude, and often have harmful, even life‐threatening, outcomes. Yet, the extent to which people believe that combined hazards can present synergistic risks is unclear. We present the results of two experimental studies aimed at addressing this issue. In both studies, participants examined synergistic and additive risk scenarios, and judged whether these were possible. The results indicate that the proportion of people who believe that synergistic risks can occur declines linearly as the magnitude of the synergistic risk increases. We also find that people believe, despite scientific evidence to the contrary, that certain hazard combinations are more likely to present additive or weakly synergistic risks than synergistic risks of higher magnitudes. Furthermore, our findings did not vary as a simple function of hazard domain (health vs. social), but varied according to the characteristics of the specific hazards considered (specified vs. unspecified drug combinations). These results suggest that many people's beliefs concerning the risk attributable to combined hazards could lead them to underestimate the threat posed by combinations that present synergistic risks, particularly for hazard combinations that present higher synergistic risk magnitudes. These findings highlight a need to develop risk communications that can effectively increase awareness of synergistic risks.
In: The international journal of social psychiatry, Band 57, Heft 3, S. 211-223
ISSN: 1741-2854
Background: The application of formal lifelong learning to enhance social inclusion in mental health is rarely investigated in terms of change in the lives of service users on a cross-country comparative scale. Aims: This study was aimed at examining changes in key areas of the lives of mental health service users across eight European mental health sites. Method: A before and after case study design was applied. Users of mental health services who participated in the lifelong leaning interventions reviewed the changes in key areas of their lives at baseline and 10 months later, through the thematic analysis of qualitative data collected in semi-structured interviews (27 and 21, respectively) and self-reports (138 and 99, respectively). In-depth examples from one site are provided. Results: Most users reported positive changes in the areas of training and social networks, with a sizeable minority moving onto unpaid and paid employment. In addition most users reported active planning for job search and other goals. Obstacles that were highlighted included the negative effects of having a mental illness, difficulties in close relationships and economic disadvantages. Conclusions: The lifelong learning intervention offered within an EU Framework 6 project to mental health service users in eight demonstration sites had a largely positive impact on key areas of their lives at 10 months, though obstacles remained which may be less amenable to change by social interventions.
In: Development in practice, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 425-433
ISSN: 1364-9213
In: FUTURES-D-24-00645
SSRN