Strengthening competitiveness of local public service providers in Germany
In: International review of administrative sciences: an international journal of comparative public administration, Band 72, Heft 4, S. 473-492
ISSN: 0020-8523
6474 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International review of administrative sciences: an international journal of comparative public administration, Band 72, Heft 4, S. 473-492
ISSN: 0020-8523
SSRN
In: GRUR international: Journal of European and International IP Law, Band 72, Heft 5, S. 506-514
ISSN: 2632-8550
Czech national group of the IFPI (Česká národní skupina Mezinárodní federace hudebního průmyslu, z. s.) (plaintiff) v I&Q GROUP, spol. s r.o. (defendant 1), Hellspy SE (defendant 2)
In: Local government studies, Band 39, Heft 2, S. 298-300
ISSN: 0300-3930
In: Zeitschrift für vergleichende Politikwissenschaft: ZfVP = Comparative governance and politics, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 29-52
ISSN: 1865-2646
World Affairs Online
In: Social change, Band 45, Heft 2, S. 308-323
ISSN: 0976-3538
Mushrooming of privatisation which one witnesses at all levels in education aggravates marginalisation and exclusion. It has a crippling effect on the principle of equality of opportunity in education, which is a fundamental principle established by almost all international human rights conventions. Instead of supplementing education, private providers are supplanting it. Rather than controlling this phenomenon, governments even provide subsidy to private providers. There is widespread concern with the negative effects of privatisation in education in scholarly writings by intellectual community, civil society organisations and international organisations. Every child is entitled to education free of cost as an inalienable right, and access to education should not be based on capacity to pay fees which often are exorbitant. This also puts in jeopardy the principles of social justice and equity, which are key pillars of the United Nations system. Safeguarding education as a public good and fostering its humanist mission is of paramount importance. Under no circumstances education should be allowed to be mercantalised. States have the obligation to ensure that when education is provided by non-State entities, the principles and norms underlying right to education are respected, and education is not allowed to be reduced to business. They have the obligation to regulate and control all private providers in education and protect public interest in education. Abusive practices by private providers denote the failure of States to adequately monitor and regulate privatised education. This calls for strengthening human rights mechanisms to effectively address and sanction all abusive practices. In this, governments can be inspired by numerous decisions by courts and emerging jurisprudence.
Nutzung von Dienstleistungsanbietern. Einstellung zum Anbieterwechsel.
GESIS
The paper presents the legal status of existing public enterprises in Slovenia before and after the adoption of Public-Private Partnership Act, that demanded the reorganization of existing public enterprises in the period 2007-2009. The paper also presents the analysis of local public utilities delivery mechanisms in Slovenia, focusing on the local public utilities providers in the field of water and waste management. The aim of the paper is to introduce the changes in the legal status of existing public enterprises, caused by new legislation and also to give an insight into the current state of local public utilities providers in the field of water and waste management. The results confirm the fact that public enterprise is the most common organizational form of local public utilities providers in the field of water and waste management and lead to conclusion that in the reorganization process the majority of existing public enterprises retained the status of a public enterprise.
BASE
In: European Journal of Political Economy, Band 36, S. 303-327
In: JeDEM: eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, Band 8, Heft 1, S. 28-61
ISSN: 2075-9517
Abstract: Since 2009, Open Government Data initiatives have been launched worldwide and the concept of open data is gaining momentum. Open data are often associated with realizing ambitions, such as a more transparent and efficient government, solving societal problems and increased economic value. However, between proposing an open data policy and successful implementation are some practicable obstacles, especially for government agencies required to generate sufficient revenue to cover their operating costs, so-called self-funding agencies. With lost revenue due to open data, there is a real risk that the update frequency and the quality of data may suffer or that the open data policy may even have to be reversed. This article has researched the financial effects of open data policies for self-funding agencies on their business model. The article provides some hands-on proposals for self-funding agencies having to implement an open data policy whilst ensuring their long-term sustainability.
Abstract: Since 2009, Open Government Data initiatives have been launched worldwide and the concept of open data is gaining momentum. Open data are often associated with realizing ambitions, such as a more transparent and efficient government, solving societal problems and increased economic value. However, between proposing an open data policy and successful implementation are some practicable obstacles, especially for government agencies required to generate sufficient revenue to cover their operating costs, so-called self-funding agencies. With lost revenue due to open data, there is a real risk that the update frequency and the quality of data may suffer or that the open data policy may even have to be reversed. This article has researched the financial effects of open data policies for self-funding agencies on their business model. The article provides some hands-on proposals for self-funding agencies having to implement an open data policy whilst ensuring their long-term sustainability.
BASE
In: Adherence of Public Defense Providers to ABA Ten Principles: Perceptions, Benchmarks Achieved in Practice, Issues Encountered, and Technical Assistance Needs Emerging. BJA Ten Principles Technical Assistance. December 31, 2014
SSRN
In: New directions for mental health services: a quarterly sourcebook, Band 1990, Heft 46, S. 57-63
ISSN: 1558-4453
AbstractAs client‐consumer groups grow, their role in the design and implementation of community mental health services is enlarged. Just as the psychotherapist must pay attention to the client's desires, so must mental health providers pay close attention to the wishes of client‐consumers and their potential contribution to the evolution of the service delivery system.
Tools, products, data and services related to climate change may significantly contribute to climate change mitigation and adaptation. In order to develop a market for climate services, information on the current landscape of climate service providers and their portfolios is needed. In this paper we present a systematic analysis of the supply side of the climate service market, which is based on survey results and an extensive desk research resulting in a collection of information about 371 public and private climate service providers in the EU Member States. Our analyses show that even though the number of identified private sector providers considerably increased compared to previous mappings, the market is still dominated by public climate service providers. Based on the definition of climate services applied here, our data show an unequal distribution of climate service providers in the EU Member States with a significant gap between Eastern Member States and the rest of the European Union. In general, the supply side is dominated by downstream activities such as advisory services or publications compared to upstream services such data collection. For both public and private providers, the primarily targeted sectors are water, energy, agriculture and urban/spatial planning. While decision makers and politicians are important target groups for both provider categories, the general public and researchers are mainly addressed by public providers whereas corporations/industries are primarily served by private providers.
BASE