Suchergebnisse
Filter
Format
Medientyp
Sprache
Weitere Sprachen
Jahre
81763 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Military Aspects of the National Defense Program
In: Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 140
Program guidelines : preventive cardiology academic award
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015029189233
"October 11, 1986." ; Shipping list no.: 86-769-P. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In defense of ethical guidelines
In: AI and ethics, Band 3, Heft 3, S. 1013-1020
ISSN: 2730-5961
AbstractRecently, Luke Munn attacked "AI ethics" generally, or guidelines, principles, codes of ethics, ethical frameworks. In particular, he argued that ethical guidelines are useless. Here I respond to this critique, arguing that Munn's criticism is mostly unfair and misguided, and that his own proposal is already implemented in various guidelines.
The Common Defense: Strategic Programs in National Politics
In: The Western political quarterly, Band 15, Heft 3, S. 560
ISSN: 1938-274X
Responsibilities in relation to the national defense program: industry
In: The survey. Survey graphic : magazine of social interpretation, Band 20, S. 610
ISSN: 0196-8777
U.S. Missile Defense Program Is Pivotal to National Security
In: National defense, Heft 525, S. 12-13
ISSN: 0092-1491
DEFENSE EXPORTS - Defense Dept's Export Loan Program Mired in Uncertainty
In: National defense, Heft 556, S. 34-35
ISSN: 0092-1491
Who Pays for National Defense? Financing Defense Programs in the United States, 19472007
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 56, Heft 3, S. 413-439
ISSN: 0022-0027, 0731-4086
Political guidelines
Additional guidelines thatThe Nationalset for its reporters to follow in coverage of political stories during the June general election.
BASE
Who Pays for National Defense? Financing Defense Programs in the United States, 1947-2007
SSRN
Working paper
Who Pays for National Defense? Financing Defense Programs in the United States, 1947-2007
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 56, Heft 3
ISSN: 1552-8766
Past studies on military expenditures in the United States have primarily focused on the extent to which guns versus butter trade-offs are prevalent without examining this relationship in the context of how other fiscal policy tools are used to pay for defense. Using annual data from 1947-2007, this study examines the relative importance of defense financing policy measures, such as guns versus butter trade-offs, tax increases, and deficit spending in paying for defense. The results show evidence of guns versus butter trade-off during the Reagan Era, but not during other periods. Both federal tax policy and deficit spending have played influential roles in funding defense spending during peacetime. This modeling strategy points to the importance of analyzing the effects of multiple fiscal policy tools when studying the forces that drive military spending in the United States since World War II. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright holder.]
World Affairs Online
Who Pays for National Defense? Financing Defense Programs in the United States, 1947–2007
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 56, Heft 3, S. 413-438
ISSN: 1552-8766
Past studies on military expenditures in the United States have primarily focused on the extent to which guns versus butter trade-offs are prevalent without examining this relationship in the context of how other fiscal policy tools are used to pay for defense. Using annual data from 1947–2007, this study examines the relative importance of defense financing policy measures, such as guns versus butter trade-offs, tax increases, and deficit spending in paying for defense. The results show evidence of guns versus butter trade-off during the Reagan Era, but not during other periods. Both federal tax policy and deficit spending have played influential roles in funding defense spending during peacetime. This modeling strategy points to the importance of analyzing the effects of multiple fiscal policy tools when studying the forces that drive military spending in the United States since World War II.