Evaluating Presidential Runoff Elections
In: Electoral Studies, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 129-146
This paper develops two criteria for institutional evaluation -- necessity & convenience -- & applies them to the analysis of 76 presidential elections in Latin America between 1979 & 2002. Over the last 20 years, a majority of Latin American countries have adopted presidential runoff electoral systems, but the empirical evidence suggests that both the necessity & convenience of this institution can be questioned. The need for runoff elections is dubious when the most voted candidate in the first round has obtained enough votes to become a legitimate winner, & their convenience is questionable when the candidate elected in the runoff election lacked enough political support to rule. The latter problem has been most visible when the front-runner in the first round was defeated in the runoff (i.e., when the electoral system produced an inversion of the initial outcome) in a context of low party system institutionalization. Tables, Figures, References. [Copyright 2006 Elsevier Ltd.]