Demand side collaboration and multinational procurement
In: RUSI journal, Band 146, Heft 2, S. 63-68
ISSN: 0307-1847
194446 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: RUSI journal, Band 146, Heft 2, S. 63-68
ISSN: 0307-1847
World Affairs Online
SSRN
Working paper
In: Strategic planning for energy and the environment, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 64-71
ISSN: 1546-0126
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 12, Heft 3, S. 205-221
ISSN: 0264-8377
SSRN
Working paper
In: Directions in development
In: Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, Band 82, Heft 3, S. 107-122
ISSN: 1861-1559
SSRN
In: Werkstattstechnik: wt, Band 106, Heft 6, S. 462-468
ISSN: 1436-4980
Im Zuge einer wachsenden Volatilität in der Energieversorgung werden industrielle Verbraucher zunehmend in die Balance des Energiesystems einbezogen. Sich flexibel dem Energieangebot anzupassen, stellt die industrielle Produktion vor große Herausforderungen und birgt Risiken. Um diese Herausforderungen und Risiken definieren zu können, werden digitale Fabrikmodelle in den Implementierungsprozess von Energieflexibilität in der Produktion eingebunden. Dies gestattet es, das Systemverhalten der Produktion im Rahmen von Flexibilitätsmaßnahmen zu simulieren und bewerten zu können.
Due to growing volatility in energy supply, industrial consumers are increasingly involved in balancing the energy system. When it comes to flexibly adapting production to energy supply, industrial consumers face major challenges and risks. To define these challenges and risks, digital models of the production system are used to enable flexible energy management in production by simulating and evaluating the system behaviour.
In: International Journal of Production Economics, Band 136, Heft 1
SSRN
In: Journal of managerial psychology, Band 36, Heft 1, S. 31-50
ISSN: 1758-7778
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine female leaders' attitudes toward demand-side strategies to close the gender-leadership gap and discuss implications for organizations.Design/methodology/approachThis article describes the process of knowledge co-creation that took place using an engaged scholarship epistemology over 23 interviews with North American women in senior leadership roles.FindingsFive key themes related to women leaders' attitudes toward demand-side strategies are discussed. Some felt uncertain or opposed toward these strategies, whereas others supported them. Support for these strategies was dependent on perceptions of backlash regarding the implementation of these strategies and the participants' career stage. Finally, participants acknowledged that demand-side strategies are insufficient in isolation and require additional organizational supports.Research limitations/implicationsThese findings enhance our understanding and provide theoretical refinement of the mechanisms that drive female leaders' reactions to demand-side strategies to close the gender-leadership gap.Practical implicationsParticipants advocated for certain practices to be considered when organizations contemplate the adoption of demand-side strategies. Importantly, participants advocated that the implementation of demand-side strategies would be insufficient unless organizations encourage greater dialogue regarding the gender-leadership gap, that top management support more gender inclusive leadership, and that male colleagues act as allies for women in leadership.Originality/valueThis article extends past research and theory by integrating the pragmatic perspectives of successful female leaders with previous empirical evidence to illustrate different reactions to demand-side strategies and ways for organizations to manage those in their efforts to close the gender-leadership gap.
In: Edler , J , Georghiou , L , Blind , K & Uyarra , E 2012 , ' Evaluating the demand side: New challenges for evaluation ' Research Evaluation , vol 21 , no. 1 , pp. 33-47 . DOI:10.1093/reseval/rvr002
Evaluation of research and innovation policy faces radical challenges arising from a new policy emphasis upon demand-side measures and linked to this an understanding of innovation policy as a means to achieve societal goals. This article considers the implications for the practice of evaluation at both micro and meso-levels. It uses the exemplar of an evaluation design for the European Union's Lead Market Initiative to expose the extent to which classical approaches to evaluation are valid and where new issues arise. Some problems highlighted include the difficulty of establishing a relevant baseline, the inability of public statistics constructed in supply-side mode to capture actions, the need to engage with actors who do not necessarily see themselves as part of the initiative being evaluated, long timescales and potential wide geographical scope, measures that span from micro to macro, and blurred boundaries between implementation and impact. It is concluded that there is a key role for evaluators to become involved in co-learning and co-evolution of these policy instruments in a manner analogous to the relationship between evaluation and policy development that characterized the emergence of collaborative R&D support programmes. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
BASE
In: Green Energy and Technology
Demand-Side Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading provides a comprehensive study of the latest developments in technology, protocols, implementation, and application of peer-to-peer and transactive energy concepts in energy systems and their role in worldwide energy evolution and decarbonization efforts. It presents practical aspects and approaches with evidence from applications to real-world energy systems through in-depth technical discussions, use cases, and examples. This multidisciplinary reference is suitable for researchers and industry stakeholders who focus on the field of energy systems and energy economics, as well as researchers and developers from different branches of engineering, energy, computer sciences, data, economic, and operation research fields. Offers a multidisciplinary look at peer-to-peer and transactive energy concepts; Presents state-of-the-art technical developments; Includes use cases with an emphasis on worldwide application.
Innovation policy often focuses on fortifying the incentives of firms that develop and sell new products by offering them lucrative rights to exclude competitors from the market. Regulators also rely on these same firms—and on similar incentives—to develop information about the effects of their products in patients, despite their obvious conflict of interest. The result may be a distorted understanding that leads to overuse of expensive new medical technologies. Recent technological advances have put healthcare payers in an excellent position to play a larger role in future innovation to improve healthcare and reduce its costs. Insurance companies and integrated healthcare providers have custody of treasure troves of data about healthcare provision and outcomes that can yield valuable insights about the effects of medical treatment without the need to conduct costly clinical trials. Some integrated healthcare systems have seized upon this advantage to make notable discoveries about the effects of particular products that have changed the standard of care. Moreover, to the extent that healthcare payers can profit from reducing costs, they will seek to avoid inappropriate use of costly technologies. Greater involvement of payers in healthcare innovation thus offers a potential counterweight to the incentives of product sellers to promote excessive use of costly new products. In recent years, the federal government has sought to promote innovation through analysis of healthcare records in a series of initiatives; some picture insurers as passive data repositories, while others provide opportunities for insurers to take a more active role in innovation. In this paper, we examine the role of health insurers in developing new knowledge about the provision and effects of healthcare—what we call 'demand-side innovation'. We address the contours of this underexplored area of innovation and describe the behavior of participating firms. We examine the effects of current legal rules on demand-side innovation, including ...
BASE
SSRN
Working paper