Britain and the European Communities: an economic assessment
In: [Great Britain. Parliament. Papers by command] cmnd 4289
151080 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: [Great Britain. Parliament. Papers by command] cmnd 4289
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.35112204864054
The leaf at end contains the colophon and printer's device only ; Title within ornamental border; initials, floreated or with vignette ; Numbered by chapters (i-xiii); signatures: A-D⁶ ; Place of publication and publisher from colophon ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: British journal of political science, Band 15, Heft 4, S. 517-528
ISSN: 1469-2112
Major inter-election vote shifts are characteristic of present-day American and British elections. In American elections since 1960 the presidency has changed parties on four of the six occasions. In British elections since 1959 the government has changed parties on four of the eight occasions. Students of both election systems ask whether these large and frequent shifts portend either major realignments or the weakening of the parties. The purpose of this Note is to analyse inter-election changes in the United States and Great Britain and to highlight and explain their differences.
In: Report of the Commission for the Greater Europe, Vol. 2
World Affairs Online
"Dick Leonard's Modern British Prime Ministers from Balfour to Johnson surveys the lives and careers of all the 24 Prime Ministers from Arthur Balfour to Boris Johnson in succinct, informative and entertaining chapters. Bringing to life the political achievements and personal idiosyncrasies of Britain's rulers over the 20th and 21st centuries, the author recounts the circumstances which took them to the pinnacle of British political life, probes their political and personal strengths and weaknesses, assesses their performance in office and asks what lasting influence they have had. Along the way Leonard entertains and informs, revealing little-known facts about the private lives of each of the Prime Ministers, for example, which two premiers, one Tory, one Labour were taught by the same governess as a child? Who was thrashed at his public school for writing pornography and later donated one-fifth of his wealth to the nation? Who was awarded a fourth-class degree at Oxford and went on to father eight children? Who was described by his son as 'probably the greatest natural Don Juan in the history of British politics'? This book can also form part of a two-volume set published by Routledge including the companion volume British Prime Ministers from Walpole to Salisbury: The 18th and 19th Centuries. This book will be of key interest to scholars, students and readers of British political history, the Executive, government, and British politics"--
In: Cambridge studies in law and christianity
In: Law and Christianity
From the early days of European settlement in North America, Christianity has had a profound impact on American law and culture. This volume profiles nineteen of America's most influential Christian jurists from the early colonial era to the present day. Anyone interested in American legal history and jurisprudence, the role Christianity has played throughout the nation's history, and the relationship between faith and law will enjoy this worthy and unique study. The jurists covered in this collection were pious men and women, but that does not mean they agreed on how faith should inform law. From Roger Williams and John Cotton to Antonin Scalia and Mary Ann Glendon, America's great Christian jurists have brought their faith to bear on the practice of law in different ways and to different effects.
In: Défense nationale et sécurité collective. [Englische Ausgabe] : current strategic thinking, Band [65], Heft [2], S. 45-49
ISSN: 1779-3874
World Affairs Online
In: Scottish journal of political economy: the journal of the Scottish Economic Society, Band 35, Heft 1, S. 92-96
ISSN: 1467-9485
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.35112204864096
Appended: An Acte for the Queenes Maiesties most gratious, generall, and free Pardon. [Colophon: Imprinted at London by Christopher Barker, Printer to the Queenes most excellent Maiestie.] ([12] p.; signatures: Ff⁶) ; Title within ornamental border; Royal arms, p. [2]; woodcut initials, floreated or with vignettes ; Pages [3]-[19] numbered by chapters (j-vj), pages [20]-[36] unnumbered; signatures: A⁶, B⁴, Aa-Bb⁴, Cc-Ee⁶ ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.35112204864138
Title within ornamental border; woodcut initials, floreated or with vignette ; Pages [5]-[90] numbered by chapters (j-xviij); signatures: A-D⁶, E⁴, A-C⁶ ([C⁶] blank) ; Place of publication and publisher from colophon ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: The economic history review, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 283
ISSN: 1468-0289
In: Mirovaja ėkonomika i meždunarodnye otnošenija: MĖMO, Band 65, Heft 7, S. 71-79
Sovereignty does not imply regulatory autonomy. After Brexit, the UK should align its regulatory policy with European norms, if it is interested in close partnership with the EU. Compromises must be made by both sides in order to ensure stability of the partnership. The EU will have to acknowledge the UK's right to diverge from European rules. Britain will have to partly accept the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. The structure of dispute settlement mechanism which will be created under the partnership agreement should be a product of a compromise. The present study shows that optimal structure of dispute settlement mechanism must include two different procedures: one for political issues and the other for commercial issues. The central role for the European Court of Justice must be envisaged as a part of politically oriented procedure. There must be no role for the European Court of Justice or any Union to set the pace of political communication. The latter reflects the interest of Great Britain to simplify economic relations, which means that, firstly, disputes are resolved by independent arbiters; secondly, the EU acknowledges the UK's right to diverge from European regulations; and thirdly, the UK accepts the EU's right to impose countervailing duties to compensate for adverse effects of divergence on competition. This article also examines the main problems of future British regulatory policy, especially in the field of state aid. Boris Johnson's government has decided not to form a full-fledged regulatory regime in the area of state aid. Its stance is politically appropriate since Conservative party manifesto for the 2019 general election promised to support local industries without limitations. But that decision created a great deal of economic risk. Firstly, the absence of a domestic subsidy control regulator can cause chaos within regulation system because workable norms and rules can only be sustained by a tight enforcement mechanism. Secondly, the EU can cite lack of subsidy control as an obstacle for British business to have unrestricted access to the European market.
In: Monthly Review, Band 66, Heft 7, S. 16
ISSN: 0027-0520