Chinese Interracial Marriage
In: Marriage & family review, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 35-48
ISSN: 1540-9635
37459 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Marriage & family review, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 35-48
ISSN: 1540-9635
In: Marriage & family review, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 75-89
ISSN: 1540-9635
In: Routledge Library Editions: Marriage Series
Cover -- Half Title -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Original Title Page -- Original Copyright Page -- Foreword -- Publisher's Note -- Preface -- Table of Contents -- 1 How Sexuality Develops -- 2 Noncoital Sex -- 3 Premarital Intercourse - Pro and Con -- 4 The Art of First Intercourse -- 5 Birth Control -- 6 What Can You Do if You're Pregnant? -- 7 If You Decide to Go Through a Pregnancy Unmarried -- 8 Sexual Problems -- 9 Sexual Deviations -- 10 What Professional Help Can You Get? -- 11 What of Love? -- Appendix -- A: Reproductive Biology - A Brief Review -- B: Bibliography -- C: Some Useful Addresses -- Index.
In: Cogent social sciences, Band 8, Heft 1
ISSN: 2331-1886
In: Demographic Research, Band 34, S. 525-562
ISSN: 1435-9871
In: Spatial Mobility, Migration, and Living Arrangements, S. 67-87
Cooperative marriage is a heterosexual marriage negotiated and performed by a lala (a woman with same-sex desire) and a gay man. Building on growing debates on cooperative marriage within the tongzhi community and on intensifying media and academic attention, this thesis presents an empirical investigation of how gay men and lalas understand their experiences while in cooperative marriage. The study is based on in-depth interviews, participant observation and focus group interviews of twenty-two gay men and lalas in cooperative marriage distributed across five cities in China: Beijing, Shenyang, Hangzhou, Guangzhou and Foshan. Among the questions addressed are: Why do gay men and lalas opt for this particular type of marriage? What are the lived experiences of sexual minorities facing cultural and institutional discrimination in China? What are the main living strategies and styles they adopt to cope with such discrimination? The study also explores different ways of relating to others and some novel intimate practices emerging. It is shown that, in general, these are not in harmony with the heteronormative values that are dominating society today. The new ways and practices are therefore challenging criticism from liberal rights activists, particularly with regard to issues such as coming out. I identify four types of orientations of gay men and lalas towards cooperative marriage: familial, individual, pragmatic, and idealistic. These reveal how gay men and lalas understand their relations to other main players in their lives and strategize accordingly. Among the characteristics playing key roles in their decision making are gender, being the single child of the family and co-residence with the parents in the same city (local vs. non-local). It is shown that the lives of gay men and lalas in cooperative marriage are being complicated by the need to negotiate multiple relationships, e.g., with the marital partner, the same-sex partner, the marital partner's partner, the natal family, the in-laws, and the gay community around. I also theorize on the major types of politics of intimate relationships engaged in by gay men and lalas as they craft their living spaces while in cooperative marriage. Finally, I demonstrate that cooperative marriage has led to a new sub-cultural tongzhi movement where gay men and lalas build on the rapport they have developed with each other; e.g., they share information and experiences while participating in semi-open public discussions and matchmaking events. This is leading to emergent types of new ethics within the community which have critically challenged the stereo types and dominant narratives on tongzhi strategizing. ; published_or_final_version ; Social Work and Social Administration ; Master ; Master of Philosophy
BASE
In: Demography, Band 51, Heft 4, S. 1357-1379
ISSN: 1533-7790
AbstractPolicies to promote marriage are controversial, and it is unclear whether they are successful. To analyze such policies, one must distinguish between a marriage that is created by a marriage-promoting policy (marginal marriage) and a marriage that would have been formed even in the absence of a state intervention (average marriage). We exploit the suspension of a cash-on-hand marriage subsidy in Austria to examine the differential behavior of marginal and average marriages. The announcement of an impending suspension of this subsidy led to an enormous marriage boom among eligible couples that allows us to locate marginal marriages. Applying a difference-in-differences approach, we show that marginal marriages are surprisingly as stable as average marriages but produce fewer children, children later in marriage, and children who are less healthy at birth.
In: Journal of ethnic and migration studies: JEMS, Band 39, Heft 5, S. 773-789
ISSN: 1469-9451
In: The family coordinator, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 191
In 1901, the year of Australian federation, the newly constituted State of Queensland restricted marriage between Indigenous women and non-Indigenous men. These amendments to the Aboriginal Protection Act legislation of 1897 criminalized the informal marital arrangements that criss-crossed Queensland's cultural and colonizing boundaries. The stated aims of the policy were to "protect" Indigenous women from sexual exploitation and to prevent the birth of "half-castes" or mixed descent children. Yet, as established or de facto marital relationships were considered a greater affront to the colonial/national project than casual sex, police only arrested those who "cohabited" with and openly acknowledged their Indigenous partners
BASE
In 1901, the year of Australian federation, the newly constituted State of Queensland restricted marriage between Indigenous women and non-Indigenous men. These amendments to the Aboriginal Protection Act legislation of 1897 criminalized the informal marital arrangements that criss-crossed Queensland's cultural and colonizing boundaries. The stated aims of the policy were to "protect" Indigenous women from sexual exploitation and to prevent the birth of "half-castes" or mixed descent children. Yet, as established or de facto marital relationships were considered a greater affront to the colonial/national project than casual sex, police only arrested those who "cohabited" with and openly acknowledged their Indigenous partners
BASE
In: Social sciences in Asia volume 23
Preliminary Materials /P. Straughan -- Chapter One. Overview Of Divorce In Contemporary Singapore—Taking Stock /P. Straughan -- Chapter Two. Choosing The Right One—Romantic Love, Courtship And Marriage Preparation /P. Straughan -- Chapter Three. What Dreams Are Made Of—Role Of Ideology In Marriage And Divorce /P. Straughan -- Chapter Four. The Time Bind—Work And Family Interface /P. Straughan -- Chapter Five. Looking Ahead—The Future Of Family /P. Straughan -- Appendices /P. Straughan -- References /P. Straughan -- Index /P. Straughan.