Dark sides of the proposed Framework Convention on Global Health's many virtues: A systematic review and critical analysis
In: Health and Human Rights, Band 15, Heft 1
Abstract
The costs of any proposal for new international law must be fully evaluated and compared with benefits and competing alternatives to ensure adoption will not create more problems than solutions. A systematic review of the research literature was conducted to categorize and assess limitations and unintended negative consequences associated with the proposed Framework Convention on Global Health (FCGH). A critical analysis then interpreted these findings using economic, ethical, legal, and political science perspectives. Of the 442 documents retrieved, nine met the inclusion criteria. Collectively, these documents highlighted that an FCGH could duplicate other efforts, lack feasibility, and have questionable impact. The critical analysis reveals that negative consequences can result from the FCGH's proposed form of international law and proposed functions of influencing national budgets, realizing health rights and resetting global governance for health. Four options for revising the FCGH proposal are developed to address its weaknesses and strengthen its potential for impact. Adapted from the source document.
Themen
Sprachen
Englisch
Verlag
Harvard School of Public Health, Boston MA
Problem melden