Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
In: Ideas in context 79
Beginning with a sustained analysis of Seneca's theory of monarchy in the treatise De clementia, in this 2007 text Peter Stacey traces the formative impact of ancient Roman political philosophy upon medieval and Renaissance thinking about princely government on the Italian peninsula from the time of Frederick II to the early modern period. Roman Monarchy and the Renaissance Prince offers a systematic reconstruction of the pre-humanist and humanist history of the genre of political reflection known as the mirror-for-princes tradition - a tradition which, as Stacey shows, is indebted to Seneca's speculum above all other classical accounts of the virtuous prince - and culminates with a comprehensive and controversial reading of the greatest work of renaissance political theory, Machiavelli's The Prince. Peter Stacey brings to light a story which has been lost from view in recent accounts of the Renaissance debt to classical antiquity, providing a radically revisionist account of the history of the Renaissance prince
In: Ideas in context 79
Cover; Half-title; Series-title; Title; Copyright; Contents; Acknowledgements; Introduction; PART I The Roman Princeps; CHAPTER 1 The Roman theory of monarchy; PART II The Roman Theory and the Formation of the Renaissance Princeps; CHAPTER 2 The pre-humanist formation of the Renaissance princeps; PART III The Humanist Princeps in the Trecento; CHAPTER 3 Royal humanism in the Regnum Siciliae; CHAPTER 4 Princely humanism in the Italian civitas; PART IV The Humanist Princeps from the Quattrocento to the High Renaissance; CHAPTER 5 Princeps, rex, imperator; PART V The Machiavellian Attack.
Problem melden