In: Oxford legal philosophy
Methodological assumptions : how to approach a philosophical inquiry into the topic of ignorance of law -- Existing law, scholarly commentary, and what to learn from it -- Responsibility -- Refinements, qualifications, complexities -- The real world
In: Oxford legal philosophy
This work argues that ignorance of law should usually be a complete excuse from criminal liability. It defends this conclusion by invoking two presumptions: first, the content of criminal law should conform to morality; second, mistakes of fact and mistakes of law should be treated symmetrically
In: Oxford Legal Philosopies Ser.
This book argues that ignorance of law should usually be a complete excuse from criminal liability. It defends this conclusion by invoking two presumptions: first, the content of criminal law should conform to morality; second, mistakes of fact and mistakes of law should be treated symmetrically. The author grounds his position in an underlying theory of moral and criminal responsibility according to which blameworthiness consists in a defective response to the moral reasons one has.
Problem melden