In: Law and Visual Jurisprudence Ser. v.3
Intro -- Acknowledgements -- Contents -- Chapter 1: Introduction -- 1.1 Origin of the Book -- 1.2 Context and the Main Subject -- 1.3 A Glimpse of Chapter 2 -- 1.4 A Glance at Chapter 3 -- 1.5 A Peek at Chapter 4 -- 1.6 Foreshadowing the Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 2: Courts, Courtrooms, and Power Distance -- 2.1 Organizational Culture of Courts -- 2.1.1 Courts as Organizations -- 2.1.2 Concept of Organizational Culture -- 2.1.3 Applications -- 2.1.4 Organizational Culture Dimensions -- 2.2 Geert Hofstede´s Concept of Power Distance -- 2.2.1 Introduction -- 2.2.2 On Geert Hofstede´s Definition of Power Distance -- 2.2.3 Differences Between Low and High Power Distance -- 2.2.4 Critique of Hofstede´s Concept of Power Distance -- 2.2.5 (After All) Positive Reflection -- 2.3 Using the Concept of Power Distance in the Legal Context -- 2.3.1 The Relative Lack of Interest -- 2.3.2 Procedural Justice and Power Distance -- 2.3.3 Decision-Makers and Power Distance -- 2.3.4 Lay Assessors, Judicial Decision-Making, and Power Distance -- 2.3.5 Common Points -- 2.4 Searching for Inspiration -- 2.4.1 Establishing the Guiding Criteria -- 2.4.2 Krzysztof Pałecki´s Normativity-Oriented Concept of Power -- 2.4.3 Some Polemic Thoughts -- 2.4.4 Lesson Learned -- 2.5 Toward the Three-Level Power Distance Concept -- 2.6 Subjective Power Distance -- 2.7 Organizational Power Distance -- 2.7.1 The Basics -- 2.7.2 Relative Independence -- 2.7.3 Coherence -- 2.7.4 ``Incompleteness´´ -- 2.7.5 Researching Organizational Power Distance -- 2.8 Interactional Power Distance -- 2.8.1 The Basics -- 2.8.2 Relativity -- 2.8.3 Controllability and Uncontrollability -- 2.8.4 Researching Interactional Power Distance -- 2.9 Self-Critical Reflection on Three-Level Power Distance -- 2.10 Commentary on Communication Accommodation Theory -- 2.10.1 Basic Idea.
In: Law and Visual Jurisprudence 3
In: Springer eBook Collection
Problem melden