The language of nation-state building in late Qing China: a case study of the Xinmin Congbao and the Minbao, 1902-1910

Cover -- Endorsements -- Half Title -- Series -- Title -- Copyright -- Dedication -- Contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgements -- List of abbreviations -- Introduction: intellectual and linguistic genesis of the Chinese nation -- 1 The lure of utopia: Liang Qichao and Xinmin Congbao -- 2 The discourse of xinmin: mindset remodelling -- 3 The press debate between Xinmin Congbao and Minbao, 1905-1907 -- 4 The discourse of guomin: rule of the people vs. rule of the state -- 5 Translating 'nation': the remaking of the Chinese society -- 6 Rupture in modernity and the struggle for national identities -- Appendix 1 List of key articles in the late Qing press debate corpus -- Appendix 2 Top 20 concept nouns in the late Qing press debate -- Appendix 3 Top 50 concept nouns in the full-text of Xinmin Congbao and Minbao -- Appendix 4 Occurrence frequency of the term 'state 国家', 1830-1930 -- Appendix 5 Occurrence frequency of the term 'nation 民族', 1830-1930 -- Appendix 6 Occurrence frequency of the term 'revolution 命', 1830-1930 -- Appendix 7 Occurrence frequency of the term 'democracy 民主', 1830-1930 -- Appendix 8 Occurrence frequency of the term 'people's rights 民权', 1830-1930 -- Appendix 9 The top 30 collocation word chains for guomin in the debate corpus -- Index.

"The Language of Nation-State Building in Late Qing China investigates the linguistic and intellectual roots of China's modern transformation by presenting a systematic study of the interplay between language innovation and socio-political upheavals in the final decade of the Qing Empire. This book examines the formations, internal tensions, and promotion of such macroconcepts as 'nation people' (guomin), nation (minzu), society (qun), state (guojia) and revolution (gemin) as novel ideas borrowed from Europe but mediated through Meiji Japan. Using corpus-based discourse analysis of the full-text corpus (4.2 million words) of the two most influential periodicals Xinmin Congbao and Minbao, this book scrutinises the multi-faceted formulations of these concepts and their impact. It underscores the adaptation and appropriation of European post-enlightenment values to the socio-political conditions of late Qing society. The analysis centres on the epic debate (1905-07) between these two periodicals that offered two distinctive visions of future China. Comparable to the 18th century great debate between Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine on the French Revolution, the Chinese debate has hitherto attracted little scholarly attention outside China. Yet, the debate not only turned the tidal wave of the public opinion against the Manchu monarchy and contributed to its downfall in 1911; it has given rise to a radical current of intellectual thinking whose ramifications have been keenly felt throughout 20th century China. This book represents the first study in English on this press debate that contributes significantly to the intellectual foundation of modern China. This book will be useful and relevant to academics, postgraduate students and final year undergraduate students in the field of Chinese Studies, and anyone interested in the role of language in shaping modern intellectual history"--