Comprehensive care with antiretroviral therapy for injecting‐drug users associates to low community viral load and restriction of HIV outbreak

In: Journal of the International AIDS Society, Band 15, Heft S4, S. 1-2

Abstract

An outbreak of HIV was detected amongst Finnish injecting‐drug users (IDUs) in 1998. The outbreak was caused by CRF01‐AE virus [1]. A comprehensive care programme including infectious diseases, addiction medicine, low threshold methadone program, needle exchange, accommodation and other social services started in December 2000. Funding was provided by municipalities. We have described earlier how the outbreak became geographically and socially restricted [2]. The data of newly diagnosed HIV infections in the hospital district of Helsinki and Uusimaa (Helsinki region) amongst IDUs and HIV‐1 subtypes were obtained from the Finnish national HIV registry. The Helsinki University Central Hospital (HUCH) registry was used to obtain the number of IDUs in HIV care, on antiretroviral therapy (ART), and plasma HIV‐1 RNA (VL) amongst IDUs. The HUCH registry also includes IDUs diagnosed with HIV infection in other Finnish regions, but currently living in Helsinki region. The highest number (n=65) of newly diagnosed HIV infections among IDUs in Helsinki region was observed in 1999 (Figure 1). Between 1998 and 2011, 249 IDUs were diagnosed with HIV infection. From 1998 to 2004 the subtype was CRF01‐AE in 187 (92%) cases, other subtypes in 5 (2%) cases and not subtyped in 11 (5%) cases. From 2005 to 2011 the subtype was CRF01‐AE in 25 (54%) cases, other subtypes in 15 (33%) cases and not subtyped in 6 (13%) cases. In 2011 there were 4 IDUs diagnosed with HIV, one of them with CRF01‐AE. In the Helsinki region out of 183 HIV‐infected IDUs in 2005, 100 (55%) had VL<50 copies/ml and out of 167 HIV‐infected IDUs in 2011, 133 (80%) had VL<50 copies/ml in 2011. We propose that from 2005 the low HIV‐1 RNA in plasma of IDUs has contributed to the low incidence of HIV among IDUs in Helsinki region. However, the incidence of HIV started to decline before the decline of VL in the cohort (Figure 1). This suggests that other factors besides ART may have decreased the risk of HIV infection among IDUs before ART coverage of the cohort became considerable. Other subtypes of HIV circulated among IDUs in the Helsinki region during the observation period, which emphasises the necessity of health promoting services (e.g. needle exchange) to be available to all IDUs.image