Aufsatz(elektronisch)April 1937
State Constitutional Development in 1936
In: American political science review, Band 31, Heft 2, S. 280-285
Verfügbarkeit an Ihrem Standort wird überprüft
Dieser Artikel ist auch in Ihrer Bibliothek verfügbar: |
elektronisch
gedruckt
Abstract
Something more aggressive than the laws of probability determined the fate of state constitutional amendments last year. Yea-sayers dominated nay-sayers in the ratio of three to two. Ninety amendments of the 158 under consideration in 35 states received the electoral imprimatur. In this general mood of acceptance, only California was steadfastly negativistic, rejecting 16 of the 20 proposed changes. Louisianians, on the other hand, took practically all that was offered—with unselective enthusiasm approving 33 of the 34 amendments on their imposing ballots.
Problem melden