Aufsatz(elektronisch)Oktober 1991

Linear Versus Nonlinear Analysis in the Measurement of Effects in a Quasi-Experimental Design

In: Evaluation review: a journal of applied social research, Band 15, Heft 5, S. 625-638

Verfügbarkeit an Ihrem Standort wird überprüft

Abstract

In this study, a two-step procedure for the analysis of pretest-posttest data is developed and illustrated. In the first step, a nonlinear canonical correlation analysis was conducted on data from a pretest-posttest control group design. This technique transforms the measure of the pretests (including the scores on the treatment variable) and the posttests in such a way that they become interrelated linearly and possible deviations from the linear model due to nonlinearity have been minimized. In the second step, the resulting optimally scaled set of pretest and posttest measures were analyzed using covariance procedures to assess program effects. The resultant variance appeared to be increased substantially, either by a better prediction of posttest scores from pretest scores, by a better estimation of the effect of the treatment, or by both. It is concluded that the two-step procedure indeed has important advantages.

Sprachen

Englisch

Verlag

SAGE Publications

ISSN: 1552-3926

DOI

10.1177/0193841x9101500506

Problem melden

Wenn Sie Probleme mit dem Zugriff auf einen gefundenen Titel haben, können Sie sich über dieses Formular gern an uns wenden. Schreiben Sie uns hierüber auch gern, wenn Ihnen Fehler in der Titelanzeige aufgefallen sind.