Article(electronic)April 12, 2019

Politics of Meaning in Categorizing Innovation: How Chefs Advanced Molecular Gastronomy by Resisting the Label

In: Organization studies: an international multidisciplinary journal devoted to the study of organizations, organizing, and the organized in and between societies, Volume 41, Issue 2, p. 267-290

Checking availability at your location

Abstract

This study examines innovators' efforts to conceptualize and communicate their novel work through categorization. Specifically, we view category formation as a controversial process of meaning making, which we theorize through the concept of "politics of meaning" and operationalize through a social semiotics approach. By analyzing the labeling controversies underlying a new culinary style publicized as "molecular gastronomy", we find that innovators' efforts at categorization unfold along four consecutive stages: experimenting with a new style, communicating the new style, contesting the dominant label, and legitimating the category meaning. Our study suggests that a new category's dominant label can substantially deviate from the innovators' intended denotations, yet nonetheless bring that category forward by triggering public negotiations around its meaning, which lead to categorical deepening and legitimation. By putting forward a "politics of meaning" view on categorizing innovation, this work advances our understanding of the connection between labeling and category formation in the context of innovation.

Languages

English

Publisher

SAGE Publications

ISSN: 1741-3044

DOI

10.1177/0170840619835268

Report Issue

If you have problems with the access to a found title, you can use this form to contact us. You can also use this form to write to us if you have noticed any errors in the title display.