Negotiation democracy versus consensus democracy: Parallel conclusions and recommendations

In: European journal of political research: official journal of the European Consortium for Political Research, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 107-113

Abstract

Abstract. In spite of a large number of disagreements concerning methodological and classificatory questions between Klaus Armingeon and myself, our substantive conclusions are very similar. Armingeon concludes that all three aspects of his negotiation democracy (consociationalism, corporatism, and counter‐majoritarian institutions) result in superior government performance in selected areas – a finding that I interpret as supportive of my similar claims for the executives‐parties dimension of consensus democracy (which consists of consociationalism plus corporatism) as well as for the federal‐unitary dimension (which is the same as Armingeon's counter‐majoritarian institutions). We are therefore also in broad agreement on the advice we can give to democratic constitutional engineers.