Article(electronic)September 1, 2016

How Accurately Do Different Evaluation Methods Predict the Reliability of Survey Questions?

In: Journal of survey statistics and methodology: JSSAM, Volume 4, Issue 3, p. 362-381

Checking availability at your location

Abstract

A diverse range of evaluation methods is available for detecting problems with survey questions. Ex-ante methods are relatively inexpensive because they do not require data collection. Other methods require data collection in either the laboratory or the field. This study evaluates the extent to which four ex-ante methods (the Question Understanding Aid [QUAID], the Survey Quality Profile [SQP], the Questionnaire Appraisal System [QAS], and expert review), one laboratory method (cognitive interviews), and two field methods (behavior coding and measurement of response latency) predict the reliability of answers to questions. The findings suggest (1) a multimethod approach to evaluation is appropriate given differences between the methods in their prediction of reliability and (2) a combination of a subset of the methods is most predictive of reliability: QAS, QUAID, SQP, cognitive interviewing, and expert review worked as well as the seven methods together.

Languages

English

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

ISSN: 2325-0992

DOI

10.1093/jssam/smw014

Report Issue

If you have problems with the access to a found title, you can use this form to contact us. You can also use this form to write to us if you have noticed any errors in the title display.