Mirrors without warnings
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 198, Heft 3, S. 2427-2447
Abstract
AbstractVeritism, the position that truth is necessary for epistemic acceptability, seems to be in tension with the observation that much of our best science is not, strictly speaking, true when interpreted literally. This generates a paradox: (1) truth is necessary for epistemic acceptability; (2) the claims of science have to be taken literally; (3) much of what science produces is not literally true and yet it is acceptable. We frame Elgin's project inTrue Enoughas being motivated by, and offering a particular resolution to, this paradox. We discuss the paradox with a focus on scientific models and argue that there is another resolution available which is compatible with retaining veritism: rejecting the idea that scientific models should be interpreted literally.
Sprachen
Englisch
Verlag
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
ISSN: 1573-0964
DOI
Problem melden