Suchergebnisse

Global governance has altered institutional architecture and the systemic and institutional conditions under which power is exercised, as well as the characteristics of the political system, the form of government, and the system of intermediation of interests. However, although it has surpassed the State's dimension of power, it created new interstate dimensions and new relations between powers, particularly at the level of cities. Cities have helped to solve common problems in a more efficient and effective way by facilitating the exchange of knowledge, sharing of solutions and resources, and building capacity to implement and monitor progress in order to achieve collectively agreed goals, in a bottom-up approach. Cities have the virtue of securing the most direct social and political contract between societies and the notion of authority. This study, therefore, aims to reflect on this emerging, less hierarchical and rigid governance and address complex global challenges such as climate and demographic change; increasing crime rates; disruptive technology; and pressures on resources, infrastructure and energy. As a global/local interface, cities can ensure effective solutions to current challenges and act together in areas where the global agenda has stalled.

Neoliberalism in the Philippines came at a time when the country was considered the "Sick Man of Asia" and during the immediate decade of the post-Cold War. This article provides a partial explanation why more neoliberal forms of governance were adopted during the Ramos Administration. Using an ideational approach in the political economy of public policy and governance reforms, the article traces how neoliberal governance gained acceptance in the Philippines. It argues that through a three-level reform process, the confluence of exogenous and endogenous factors, as well as the "epistemic privileged" status of neoliberalism during that time led to the demise of the Keynesian state-led governance model and the eventual acceptance of the market-led neoliberal governance model.

Abstract:The purpose of this study is to analyze/test: (1) to describe accountability, transparency, public participation, leadership performance and loyalty of members of national parties and local parties in Aceh is good; (2) the effect of accountability on the performance of party leaders of national and local parties; (3) the effect of transparency on the performance of party leaders of national and local parties; (5) the influence of accountability on the loyalty of members of national parties and local parties, (6) the influence of transparency on the loyalty of members of national parties and local parties, (7) the influence of public participation on the performance of national and local party leaders, Loyalty of members of national parties and local parties (8) the influence of the performance of national and local party leaders on the loyalty of members of national parties and local parties in Aceh and (9) the effect of accountability, transparency, public participation on the loyalty of national party members and local parties in Aceh through Performance of national party leaders and local parties in Aceh. The objects of this research are good governance, performance of national party leaders and local parties, and loyalty of members of national parties and local parties in Aceh. Methods of data analysis in this study using path analysis (Path Analysis), with the number of respondents as many as 81 people. The results showed that accountability was obtained an average value of 3.945, transparency obtained an average value of 4,045, public participation obtained an average value of 3.833, the performance of leadership obtained average value of 3.784 and loyalty cadres of national parties and local parties in Aceh obtained an average score of 4,810, thus it can be explained that this research variable is already running well. While the test results prove that accountability, transparency and public participation significantly influence the performance of leaders of national parties and local parties. Then accountability, transparency and public participation also have a significant influence on the loyalty of members of national parties and local parties.Keywords: Accountability, Transparency, Public Participation, Leaders Performance and Member LoyaltyAbstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis/menguji: (1) mendeskripsikan akuntabilitas, transparansi, partisipasi publik, kinerja pimpinan dan loyalitas anggota partai nasional dan partai lokal di Aceh sudah baik; (2) pengaruh akuntabilitas terhadap kinerja pimpinan partai nasional dan partai lokal; (3) pengaruh transparansi terhadap kinerja pimpinan partai nasional dan partai lokal; (4) pengaruh partisipasi publik terhadap kinerja pimpinan partai nasional dan partai lokal, (5) pengaruh akuntabilitas terhadap loyalitas anggota partai nasional dan partai lokal, (6) pengaruh transparansi terhadap loyalitas anggota partai nasional dan partai lokal, (7) pengaruh partisipasi publik terhadap loyalitas anggota partai nasional dan partai lokal (8) pengaruh kinerja pimpinan partai nasional dan partai lokal terhadap loyalitas anggota partai nasional dan partai lokal di Aceh dan (9) pengaruh akuntabilitas, transparansi, partisipasi publik terhadap loyalitas anggota partai nasional dan partai lokal di Aceh melalui kinerja pimpinan partai nasional dan partai lokal di Aceh. Adapun yang menjadi objek penelitian ini adalah good governance, kinerja pimpinan partai nasional dan partai lokal, dan loyalitas anggota partai nasional dan partai lokal di Aceh. Metode analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan motode analisis jalur (Path Analysis), dengan jumlah responden sebanyak 81 orang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa akuntabilitas diperoleh nilai rata-rata sebesar 3,945, transparansi diperoleh nilai rata-rata sebesar 4,045, partisipasi publik diperoleh nilai rata-rata sebesar 3,833, kinerja pimpinan diperoleh nilai rata-rata sebesar 3,784 dan loyalitas kader partai nasional dan partai lokal di Aceh diperoleh nilai rata-rata sebesar 4,810, dengan demikian dapat dijelaskan bahwa variabel penelitian ini sudah berjalan dengan baik. Sedangkan hasil pengujian membuktikan bahwa akuntabilitas, transparansi dan partisipasi publik berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap kinerja pimpinan partai nasional dan partai lokal. Kemudian akuntabilitas, transparansi dan partisipasi publik juga mempunyai pengaruh signifikan terhadap loyalitas anggota partai nasional dan partai lokal.Kata kunci: Akuntabilitas, Transparansi, Partisipasi Publik, Kinerja Pimpinan dan Loyalitas Anggota

This report was developed in the first half of 2016, when the signing of the Agreement on the Resolution of Conflict in South Sudan (ARCISS) and subsequent establishment of the Transitional Government of National Unity (TGNU) presented a possible window of opportunity to restart and reset state-building effort, in particular, to initiate a more strategic approach to capacity building. From the government side, it was possible incentives will emerge to signal a break with the past by delivering services to citizens. In this context, the main objective of the note has been to contribute a stronger evidence base for renewed efforts at supporting capacity building. Despite the renewed deterioration since mid-2016, it is expected that many of the key challenges and tensions analyzed will remain important considerations when capacity building efforts are eventually renewed. South Sudan has faced renewed conflict and a deepening macro-fiscal crisis. Shortly after the formation of the TGNU in late May 2016, fighting broke out in Juba and the security situation in the rest of the country has subsequently deteriorated. This note mainly covers the period until June 2016, as a contribution to providing a more nuanced understanding of efforts at capacity building in South Sudan. This note is primarily concerned with capacity in the civilian public service in South Sudan, and its ability to deliver public services. The note explores cross-cutting issues and challenges related to developing a capable and effective civil service and drills down into two specific areas: public financial management (PFM) and the public health sector. The report combines an analysis of the opportunities and constraints created by the evolving country context; cross-cutting factors which have shaped core public administration functions across sectors since 2005; and analysis of capacity in two selected state functions PFM and health care. The report is organized as follows: chapter one presents purpose, scope, and approach. Chapter two covers the conceptual underpinnings of the paper. Chapter three provides a cross-cutting perspective on capacity-building efforts in South Sudan, providing an overview of public sector as a tool for the management of political support, as well as the evolution of aid architecture. Chapter four covers PFM in South Sudan and chapter five addresses the health sector. Chapter six reviews key findings and emerging lessons and concludes with recommendations and options for improving monitoring of capacity-building efforts going forward.

This article analyzes the interplay of government and universities in developing policy about teacher education in England and Canada in the last twenty years. It draws on Gideonse's (1993) formulation of three distinct modes of governing teacher education: a political mode, in which the state dominates; an institutional mode, in which the university dominates; and a professional mode, where teacher organizations dominate. Using this conceptual framework, I examine three quite different patterns of governance in England, Manitoba (Canada) and British Columbia (Canada). The changes over the last twenty years within these jurisdictions suggest that the ability of universities to exert de facto control over initial teacher preparation with little involvement of the state and little accountability to the profession has changed substantially.