Suchergebnisse

ABSTRACKBackground: The rapid change from presidential regulation no. 19 year 2016 on health insurance into presidential regulation no. 28 year 2016 on health insurance get a big attention.Objectives: This research was purposed to analyze about health insurance policy which changed very quickly. It changed from presidential regulation no.19 year 2016 into presidential regulation no.28 year 2016 on health insurance.Research Methods: The researcher used qualitative methods.Results: The analysis from the input processing and output showed that the change of presidential regulation is a responsive form from president when he looked public rejection response for the increase of fee.Conclusions: The president extended it through the department of health affairs.This change has not been described a process of democracy because there's still a lack of cross-sectoral coordination role in the discussion. This change of presidential regulation not yet affected to appropriate the fee adequacy on BPJS Implementation. The department of health affairs as a leader of health sector was recommended to increase the cross-sectoral coordination which can manifest the better product of health policy and to complete the policy instrument that yet to be determined. It also used to be concern from the department of health affairs, DJSN and BPJS which explained the increase of fee must be offset by a quality improvement rather than the implementation of national health insurance. Keywords; change, policy, presidential regulationABSTRAKLatar belakang: Perubahan Peraturan Presiden No.19/2016 tentang Jaminan Kesehatan menjadi Peraturan Presiden No. 28/2016 tentang Jaminan Kesehatan yang sangat cepat menjadi sorotan yang mencolok.Tujuan: penelitian ini untuk menganalisis perubahan yang begitu cepat tentang kebijakan jaminan kesehatan Peraturan Presiden No.19/2016 tentang Jaminan Kesehatan menjadi Peraturan Presiden No.28/2016 tentang Jaminan KesehatanMetode penelitian: pendekatan kualitatif.Hasil: Berdasarkan analisis bahwa dalam proses input, proses dan output, perubahan Peraturan Presiden ini merupakan bentuk responsif Presiden melalui lembaga pemerintah Kementerian Kesehatan dengan melihat respon penolakan masyarakat akan kenaikan iuran. Proses perubahan ini belum menggambarkan sebuah proses yang demokrasi dikarenakan masih kurangnya koordinasi peran lintas sektoral dalam pembahasannya.Kesimpulan: Dengan adanya perubahan Peraturan Presiden ini berdampak belum memadainya kecukupan iuran dalam penyelenggaraan BPJS. Peran Kementerian Kesehatan sebagai leader dalam regulasi bidang kesehatan disarankan dapat meningkatkan koordinasi lintas sektoral untuk dapat mewujudkan produk kebijakan kesehatan yang lebih baik serta melengkapi instrument kebijakan yang belum ditetapkan, serta untuk menjadi perhatian sektor terkait Kementerian Kesehatan, DJSN dan BPJS Kesehatan bahwa kenaikan iuran harus dapat diimbangi dengan peningkatan kualitas daripada penyelenggaraan jaminan kesehatan nasional. Kata kunci: Perubahan, Kebijakan, Peraturan Presiden

AbstractThis article aims to explore the history of the existence of the Presidential Decree ("Perpres") in the hierarchy of laws and regulations in Indonesia. Inspired by the controversy over the position of the Perpres which had become a heated debate in the Special Committee Meeting (Draft Bill) concerning the Establishment of Invitation Laws. In fact, the House of Representatives (DPR) had proposed the abolition of Perpres from the hierarchy of laws and regulations. This is a normative legal research that uses statute approach, historical approach, and conceptual approach. This research attempts to find the history of the existence of Perpres in Indonesia. Which was then followed by an analysis of the position of the Perpres in the hierarchy of laws and regulations, both as a regulation of delegation (delegated legislation), and as "Independent Perpres", along with the problems of the test. AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk menelisik sejarah keberadaan Peraturan Presiden ("Perpres") dalam hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Terinspirasi dari kontroversi kedudukan Perpres yang sempat menjadi perdebatan yang cukup hangat dalam Rapat Panitia Khusus (Pansus) Rancangan Undang-Undang (RUU) tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang Undangan. Dengan menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan sejarah, dan pendekatan konsep, penelitian ini berusaha untuk menemukan sejarah eksistensi Perpres di Indonesia. Kemudian dilanjutkan dengan analisis tentang kedudukan Perpres dalam hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan, baik sebagai peraturan delegasi (delegated legislation), maupun sebagai "Perpres Mandiri", beserta problematika pengujiannya.

Local regulations are local regulations that are established by local specificities recognized by the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia-1945 as part of their decentralization. Local regulations can not contradict the legislation of higher order not to cause a result of the cancellation. This cancellation is the authority of the central government in relation to the unitary state. Supervision by the central government there are two models of preventive supervision and oversight repesif. Cancellation regulatory oversight repesif area is conducted on local government. Cancellation Provincial Regulation made by the President and the Minister of the Interior gave rise to a dualism. For it will be discussed on How cancellation arrangements are made with the Provincial Regulations and Regulations Presidential Decree of the Minister of the Interior? 2. What is the legal effect of the cancellation of Provincial Regulation by Presidential Decree and the Regulation of the Minister of the Interior? The issues discussed using normative research by using the approach of legislation, the legal concept analysis approach, in order to obtain answers that dualism cancellation provincial regulations stipulated in several laws including Law No. 32 Year 2004 on Regional Government, Law No. 28 year 2009 on Local Taxes and levies, Government Regulation No. 79 Year 2005 on Guidelines Direction and Control of Local Government, Minister of the Interior No. 1 Year 2014 on the Establishment of the Regional law Products stating that the authority of the cancellation of regulations made by the President of the instrument while the Presidential Decree cancellation made by the Minister of the Interior was limited to cancellation Draft Regional Regulation on stage during the evaluation of preventive supervision and legal consequences caused by the dualism cancellation of local regulations are different between cancellation made by the President and minister of Interior. Cancellation is cancellation of its President in the field of executive interim final cancellation made by the Minister of the Interior if the local government to enforce the local regulations canceled Interior Minister will ask the cancellation to the President.

ABSTRACTÂ Local regulations are local regulations that are established by local specificities recognized by the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia-1945 as part of their decentralization. Local regulations can not contradict the legislation of higher order not to cause a result of the cancellation. This cancellation is the authority of the central government in relation to the unitary state. Supervision by the central government there are two models of preventive supervision and oversight repesif. Cancellation regulatory oversight repesif area is conducted on local government. Cancellation Provincial Regulation made by the President and the Minister of the Interior gave rise to a dualism. For it will be discussed on How cancellation arrangements are made with the Provincial Regulations and Regulations Presidential Decree of the Minister of the Interior? 2. What is the legal effect of the cancellation of Provincial Regulation by Presidential Decree and the Regulation of the Minister of the Interior? The issues discussed using normative research by using the approach of legislation, the legal concept analysis approach, in order to obtain answers that dualism cancellation provincial regulations stipulated in several laws including Law No. 32 Year 2004 on Regional Government, Law No. 28 year 2009 on Local Taxes and levies, Government Regulation No. 79 Year 2005 on Guidelines Direction and Control of Local Government, Minister of the Interior No. 1 Year 2014 on the Establishment of the Regional law Products stating that the authority of the cancellation of regulations made by the President of the instrument while the Presidential Decree cancellation made by the Minister of the Interior was limited to cancellation Draft Regional Regulation on stage during the evaluation of preventive supervision and legal consequences caused by the dualism cancellation of local regulations are different between cancellation made by the President and minister of Interior. Cancellation is cancellation of its President in the field of executive interim final cancellation made by the Minister of the Interior if the local government to enforce the local regulations canceled Interior Minister will ask the cancellation to the President. Keywords: Dualism, Regional Regulation, Supervision, and Cancellation.Â

This study focuses on the implications of the existence of a marriage certificate requirement in the process of issuing a child's certificate as stated in Articles 10, 11, 12, 13, 33 and 79 of Presidential Decree No. 96 of 2018 concerning the requirements and procedures for population registration and civil registration. It is just a lack of understanding of regulations, the assumption that recording is only an administrative matter, costs and time are still polemics that are the cause of not registering marriages. Therefore, normative research with a statute approach is carried out by researchers. The primary data in this research is Law no. 23 of 2006 and Presidential Decree No. 96 of 2018. The results show that based on Law no. 23 of 2006 concerning Marriage Registration, the costs and procedures for registering marriages are getting cheaper and more accessible. In addition, the existence of Presidential Regulation No. 96 of 2018 strengthens the obligation to register marriages as mandated by Law no. 23 of 2006 and Law no. 1 of 1974.

Pasal 10 Peraturan Presiden Nomor 20 Tahun 2018 tentang Penggunaan Tenaga Kerja Asing dalam penataan izinyanya haruslah sesuai dengan ketentuan-ketentuan peraturan yang lain. Perizinan yang dimaksud adalah perizinan dengan cara menyederhanakan bentuk proses perizinan dengan tujuan untuk meningkatkan investor dan devisa ekonomi Negara. Dalam peraturan presiden nomor 20 tahun 2018 pasal 10 menyebutkan bahwa Tenaga kerja Asing pemegang saham yang menjabat direksi atau komisaris tidak diwajibkan memiliki Rencana Penggunaan Tenaga Kerja Asing (RPTKA). Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian Yuridis Normatif dengan dua pendekatan yakni pendekatan perundang-undangan, dan pendekatan konseptual.Sedangkan bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Dalam penelitian peneliti menggunakan metode analisis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian dan kesimpulan yang diperoleh dari Politik Hukum peraturan presiden nomor 20 tahun 2018 tentang penggunaan tenaga kerja asing :Pertama, pembentukan peraturan presiden no 20 tahun 2018 tentang penggunaan tenaga kerja asing, diperlukan sistem pengawasan yang lebih ketat guna pengoptimalan sebuah tujuan Negara, selain itu juga diperlukan perubahan sistem dalam sektor pendidikan guna meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya manusia tenaga kerja Indonesia dalam menghadapi persaingan internasional maupun regional. Kedua, Konsep keadilan peraturan Presiden Nomor 20 Tahun 2018 belum sepenuhnya memenuhi unsur-unsur keadilan sosial Sayyid Quthb dan dari Teori Politik Hukum Mohctar Kusumaatmdja juga belum sepenuhnya memenuhi dari unsur-unsurnya.

Aceh is a province in the Republic of Indonesia, with special autonomy authority, such as authority in article 213, article 214, article 253 paragraph 1 of Law Number 11 Year 2006 concerning Aceh Government.The law has been followed up by Presidential Decree Number 23 of 2015 on the Transfer of Regional Offices of Aceh National Land Agency and Regency/ City Land Office to Aceh Land Agency and Land Office of Aceh Regency / City. To date the transfer of status has not been implemented. This research is analytical descriptive: normative juridical approach, primary data collection technique, data analysis method: qualitative analysis.The results of the research: Aceh Land Affairs Office, has not yet become Aceh Land Agency.No the formation of Qanun which regulates concretely about the authority of the Aceh Land Agency related to the transition, is also an important factor of the non-functioning of the Aceh Land Agency.The lack of clarity on the legal status of the Aceh Land Agency as part of Aceh's regional apparatus is seen in several articles at Perpres No. 23 of 2015, this is inconsistent with the Authority Theory in running the government, as well as the principles of local government affairs, among others: the principle of decentralization, the principle of deconcentration and the principle of co-administration. Keywords: Aceh Land Agency, Presidential Regulation No. 23 Year 2015, SpecialAutonomy

AbstractThe research objective was to determine the existence of Presidential Decree No. 33-2020 in the perspective of the principles of autonomy and decentralization Regional autonomy means regional rights to regulate and manage government affairs decentralized by the central government, including financial management. Regions are given the authority to compile and implement budgets in accordance with regional capacities proportionally and rationally. For that, Presidential Decree No. 33 of 2020 has the potential to conflict with the principles of regional autonomy and decentralization, because it reduces regional independence. The central government should have sufficiently determined guidelines for creating good governance in regional government administration and carried out strict supervision, without specifying detailed and detailed figures.Keywords: decentralization; regional autonomy;regional financeAbstrakTujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui eksistensi Perpres No. 33-2020 dalam perspektif prinsip otonomi dan desentralisasi Otonomi daerah bermakna hak daerah untuk mengatur dan mengurus urusan pemerintahan yang didesentralisasikan oleh pemerintah pusat, termasuk pengelolaan keuangan. Daerah diberikan kewenangan untuk menyusun dan melaksanakan anggaran sesuai dengan kemampuan daerah secara proporsional dan rasional. Untuk itu, Perpres No. 33 Tahun 2020 berpotensi bertentangan dengan prinsip otonomi daerah dan desentralisasi, karena mereduksi kemandirian daerah. Seharusnya, pemerintah pusat cukup menentukan pedoman untuk menciptakan good governance penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah dan melakukan pengawasan secara ketat, tanpa menentukan angka yang detail dan rinci.

Ditetapkannya Perpres Nomor 10 Tahun 2020 Tentang Bidang Penanaman Modal adalah konsekuensi dari sentralisasi perizinan yang digariskan dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Namun demikian, pada lampiran tiga Perpres No 10 Tahun 2020 dinyatakan bahwa bidang usaha Industri Minuman Keras Mengandung Alkohol dan Industri Minuman Mengandung Alkohol: Anggur adalah legal dengan syarat tertentu yakni hanya berlaku di beberapa Provinsi saja yaitu Provinsi Bali, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur, Provinsi Sulawesi Utara dan Provinsi Papua dengan memperhatikan budaya dan kearifan setempat. Hal inilah yang menuai banyak protes di khalayak publik seperti Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI), Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), Muhammadiyyah dan beberapa Partai politik di parlemen turut mengkritik Perpres ini seperti dari Fraksi Partai Amanat Nasional (PAN) dan Partai Keadilan Sejahtera (PKS), dengan alasan ada sebuah masa depan generasi bangsa yang lebih besar untuk dipertimbangkan kebaikannya daripada hanya sekedar kepentingan ekonomi sesaat. Berangkat dari persoalan di atas, penulis menyimpulkan Penetapan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 10 Tahun 2021 Tentang Bidang Penanaman Modal dalam prinsip-prinsip Siyāsah Tasyrî'iyah yakni, "berangsur-angsur dalam menetapkan hukum; menyedikitkan pembuatan Undang-Undang; memberikan kemudahan dan keringanan. penetapan Perpres ini adalah untuk meningkatkan pendapatan negara dan dearah di bidang ekonomi mencerminkan pendekatan yang holistik.

Public interest cannot be said specifically. The public interest as a concept must go hand in hand with the realization of the state. The state is formed in the public interest, and law is the main means to realize the interest. The law is solely not only to ensure the public interest but also to protect the personal one so that justice can be carried out. Once, it shows how important the public interest is in the life of the state, and in practice it is contradictory to the personal interest. That is why it should be clearly defined. In the Presidential Regulation number 65 of 2006, the criteria are re-loaded, but in contrast to Presidential Decree No. 55 of 1993 the criteria are development for the public interest carried out by the Government or Regional Government which is subsequently owned or will be owned by the Government or the Regional Government, "and includes 7 (seven) activities. Different from Presidential Decree number 55 of 1993, in the criteria for limiting activities for the public interest in Presidential Regulation number 65 of 2006 it is added the word "will" be owned and not given the limit "not used for profit seeking". The method used in this study is to use normative legal research methods. Keywords: Comparison, Presidential Regulation Number 55 and Number 65 of 2016, Land Acquisition

This research resulted in the followings. First, the implementation of the Presidential Decree No. 98 year of of 2014 concerning Licensing of Micro Small Businesses with the Local Regulation of Gunung Mas regency No. 6 year of 2011 is contradictory, since the making of micro business licenses in Gunung Mas regenc is put together with the advertisement tax, and the advertisement tax is used as one of the conditions for the issuance of a micro business permit. This is what makes the Presidential Decree contradictory with the Local regulation. Second, in the field, many business people are confused with the Presidential Decree due to the lack of socialization carried out by the government, whereas the issuance of the Presidential decree is intended to increase business actors and to facilitate the process of making micro-business licenses. Key Words: Synchronization, Implementation, Licensing, Advertising Taxes

The formulation of the policies used community still has not put the development instrument oriented to the needs of the community. One of them is the enactment of Presidential Decree no. 3 of 1997 which only regulate limitation of liquor. These conditions encourage community organizations such as FPI who concentrate on the disobedience to file a retest of the material against. Presidential Regulation no. 74 of 2013 on the Control and Supervision of Alcoholic Beverages to the Supreme Court. The emergence of Presidential Regulation no. 74 of 2013 has not been able to minimize the circulation of alcohol in the community, it is increasingly alarming. Such conditions encourage government efforts to relax the Perpres. The realization of the policy of relaxing the old rules is to authorize to determine which areas can sell liquor. With the relaxation of these rules the local government will have the authority to deter- mine which areas can sell it. This policy is done because the Local Government is considered the most knowledgeable about which locations require the permission to sell liquor. By relaxing the rules, it does not mean that li- quor class A can be resold in mini market, becau- se the prohibition of beer sales is still regulated in the Minister of Trade Regulation no. 6/2015 on the second amendment toMinister of Trade no. 20 /M-DAG/4/2014 concerning Control and Supervi- sion distribution and sale liquor.Keywords: Miras, FPI, Policy.

The shelter for Rohingya refugees who were declared officially as refugees was initially rejected by the Lhokseumawe City Government, but pressure from the community made the Government finally accept the arrival of Rohingya refugees, this acceptance demanded the Lhokseumawe City Government to implement Presidential Regulation No. The formulation of the problem is first, how the form of handling given to Rohingya refugees in Lhokseumawe is reviewed according to Presidential Decree No. 125 of 2016. Second, how is the form of handling Rohingya refugees in Lhokseumawe reviewed according to fiqh siyasah. This study uses an empirical normative legal approach, using field research and library research, namely examining written law as well as facts in the field using descriptive analytical patterns to describe or provide an overview of the object under study through data or samples collected. have been collected by drawing conclusions. From the results of the study, it was found that the handling of refugees has been carried out by the Lhokseumawe City Government, namely in the form of rescue, security, shelter, and health checks for refugees, and if viewed from the fiqh siyasah their rights have also been fulfilled, especially the right to protect life, safeguard property. , worship, and a decent place to live. So it can be concluded that the handling of Rohingya refugees is in accordance with Presidential Regulation No. 125 of 2016 and fiqh siyasa through the fulfillment of the rights of refugees by saving lives and providing shelter for Rohingya refugees.

AbstractThis article aims to describe the implementation of procurement auction policy of goods and services in Sukoharjo before and after the Presidential Regulation No. 54 of 2010 on Procurement of Government Goods and Services (e-procurement), to explain constraints in the implementation of procurement auction policy of goods and services in Kabupaten Sukoharjo after the issuance of Presidential Regulation No. 54 of 2010 on Procurement of Government Goods and Services (e-procurement) and its solution. This type of legal research is sociological or non-doctrinal with qualitative research methods that aim to know the Implementation of Presidential Regulation No. 54 of 2010 on Procurement of Government Goods and Services (Case Study of Implementation of E-Procurement in Sukoharjo District). Data collection techniques used interview techniques, literature study and documentation. The result of this research is in the implementation of the policy of auction of procurement of goods and services in Sukoharjo District before the Presidential Regulation Number 54 Year 2010 concerning Procurement of Government Goods and Services (e-procurement), there is Presidential Regulation Number 54 Year 2010 concerning Procurement of Government Goods and Services -procurement) in Sukoharjo Regency in accordance with Presidential Decree No. 80 of 2003 on Guidelines for Procurement of Government Goods and Services. Implementation of procurement auction policy of goods and services in Sukoharjo District after the Presidential Regulation Number 54 Year 2010 concerning Procurement of Government Goods and Services (e-procurement) that is, the length of time required in the procurement of goods/services in LPSE Sukoharjo District is 1) fiscal year. The time required to disseminate Presidential Regulation No. 54/2010 on Procurement of Goods/Services of the Government of Sukoharjo Regency is not maximal, since the socialization provided by the Sukoharjo District Government is very limited, since this socialization is only given the ...

Peraturan Presiden Nomor 4 Tahun 2015 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah telah menggantikan peraturan sebelumnya yakni Peraturan Presiden Nomor 54 Tahun 2010. Adanya Peraturan Presiden ini ialah sebagai respon terhadap kondisi pengadaan barang/jasa pemerintah yang memerlukan inovasi dalam pelaksanaannya, yakni dengan cara pemanfaatan teknologi informasi. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dampak yang ditimbulkan dari diterapkannya Peraturan Presiden Nomor 4 Tahun 2015. Analisis dampak dilakukan dengan menyelidiki persepsi para pihak-pihak yang terlibat dalam proses pengadaan barang/jasa di Pemerintah Kabupaten Tasikmalaya terhadap prinsip-prinsip yang ada dalam pengadaan barang/jasa secara umum. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan post-positivist dengan metode deskriptif kualitatif melalui studi literatur, observasi langsung, serta wawancara mendalam dengan pihak-pihak yang berperan dalam pengadaan barang/jasa pemerintah di Kabupaten Tasikmalaya baik idari sisi pengusaha sebagai klien maupun pemerintah sebagai stakeholder yang memiliki wewenang dalam pelaksanaan pengadaan barang/jasa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Peraturan Presiden Nomor 4 tahun 2015 berdasarkan prinsipprinsip pengadaan barang/jasa pemerintah memiliki dampak bagi klien maupun stakeholder dalam pelaksanaan pengadaan barang/jasa pemerintah secara elektronik yakni melalui yang terdiri atas e-Tendering juga e-Purchasing dengan memanfaatkan sistem e- catalogue. The Presidential Regulation No. 4 of 2015 concerning of Government Goods/Services Procurement has superseded the previous regulation of Presidential Regulation No. 54 of 2010. The existence of this Presidential Regulation is in response to the condition of procurement of goods / services of government that require innovation in the implementation, by using information technology . This study aims to analyze the impact of the implementation of Presidential Regulation No. 4 of 2015. Impact analysis is done by investigating the perceptions of the parties involved in the procurement process of goods / services in Tasikmalaya Regent against the principles exiting the procurement of goods / services policy. This research uses a post-positivist approach with qualitative descriptive method through literature study, direct observation, and in-depth interviews with related parties that play a role in the procurement of goods / services in Tasikmalaya regency either from the side of employers as clients and government as stakeholders who have authority in the procurement of goods / services. This research identify that Presidential Regulation No. 4 of 2015 based on the principles of procurement of government goods / services has a various impact for clients and stakeholders in the implementation of electronic procurement of goods / services by consisting of e-Tendering and e-Purchasing with Utilizing e-catalogue system. Keywords: e-Tendering, e-Purchasing, e-catalogue, Tasikmalaya Regional Government.